Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 28, 2026

Myocardial Infarction and Functional Outcome Assessment in Pigs
Published on: April 25, 2014
Beyond Remodeling: Four Structural-Functional Recovery Patterns as a Framework for Interpreting Ventricular Recovery
Alina Crăciun-Mirescu1,2, Oana Mirea2,3, Despina Emanuela Toader2
1Doctoral School, University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Craiova, 200349 Craiova, Romania.
Abstract:
Background/Objectives: Ventricular recovery after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is commonly assessed using either structural (volumetric) or functional (ejection-fraction) criteria, although these may capture different aspects of recovery. We examined whether their cross-classification identifies distinct recovery patterns and whether myocardial mechanics and left atrial function provide additional information. Methods: We prospectively followed 101 patients with first STEMI and single-vessel coronary artery disease treated with PCI. Echocardiography was performed 12-24 h after reperfusion and at 12 ± 2 months. Structural recovery (≥15% reduction in 3D LV end-systolic volume) and functional recovery (≥5-point absolute LVEF increase) were cross-classified into four recovery patterns. Results: Among 53 patients with complete paired measurements, 10 (18.9%) showed concordant recovery, 7 (13.2%) isolated structural recovery, 9 (17.0%) isolated functional recovery, and 27 (50.9%) no recovery; 30.2% therefore showed discordant recovery. The no-recovery group was heterogeneous, including both volumetric deterioration and stable or improving volumes below the recovery threshold. Continuous changes in 3D-ESV and LVEF were only moderately correlated (ρ = 0.353, p = 0.0095), and discordance persisted in sensitivity analyses. Myocardial mechanics and LASR did not differentiate recovery patterns, but several of these baseline markers showed exploratory associations with clinical outcomes after false-discovery-rate correction. Conclusions: Structural and functional recovery after STEMI are complementary rather than interchangeable, and this discordance persisted across extensive sensitivity analyses; however, assignment of individual patients to specific recovery categories remained sensitive to the chosen thresholds and LVEF measurement method. Myocardial mechanics and LASR may provide additional information about clinical expression.
More Related Videos
14:35Post-Myocardial Infarction Heart Failure in Closed-chest Coronary Occlusion/Reperfusion Model in Göttingen Minipigs and Landrace Pigs
Published on: April 17, 2021
09:37Permanent Ligation of the Left Anterior Descending Coronary Artery in Mice: A Model of Post-myocardial Infarction Remodelling and Heart Failure
Published on: December 2, 2014