Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 29, 2026

Measuring the Subjective Value of Risky and Ambiguous Options using Experimental Economics and Functional MRI Methods
Published on: September 19, 2012
Backcountry Risk-Taking (BRiT)-An Instrument to Evaluate an Individual's Overall Risk-Taking Behavior Within the
Sarah Petelinsek1,2, Olivia Pearson3, Rowan Kelner2,3
1Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.
Abstract:
Study HypothesisThe primary objective of this study was to develop and evaluate a novel instrument called the Backcountry Risk-Taking Instrument (BRiT) to measure risk-taking behavior among backcountry users. We aimed to create an instrument that is content-valid, grounded in theory, and psychometrically sound.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional study to evaluate the psychometric properties of the instrument. Participants completed the newly developed 13-item instrument along with established measures of risk-taking behavior and risk preference to assess convergent validity.ResultsA total of 361 participants completed the survey. After listwise deletion, n = 280 were retained for factor analysis and n = 354 for convergent validity. The resulting instrument provides a concise, empirically supported framework for measuring backcountry risk behavior and establishes a foundation for prospective validation in future cohorts.ConclusionsThe BRiT instrument significantly advances avalanche risk assessment. BRiT demonstrates a clear and stable foundation built upon 3 domains: Core Gear, Avalanche History, and Terrain Choice. Continued validation and refinement across broader populations will strengthen its utility as a foundational tool for both research and applied avalanche risk management.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Relative Risk
Fundamental Attribution Error