One-shade versus multi-shade flowable composites for non-carious cervical lesions: color match and 18-month clinical performance in a double-blind, split-mouth randomized trial
Related Experiment Videos
Laryssa Mylenna Madruga Barbosa1, Michael Willian Favoreto2, Gabriel David Cochinski1
1Department of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, State University of Ponta Grossa, Ponta Grossa, Paraná, Brazil.
Objectives:
This double-blind randomized clinical trial aimed to evaluate the objective color match and clinical performance of a one-shade flowable composite (Vittra APS Unique Flow, FGM) compared with a multi-shade flowable composite (Opallis Flow, FGM) in the restoration of non-carious cervical lesions (NCCLs).
Methods:
A total of 124 NCCLs were restored in 62 participants (n = 62 restorations per material) in a randomized, split-mouth, multicenter design. Objective color parameters (ΔEab and ΔE00) were assessed using a spectrophotometer by comparing the cervical third before and after restoration and the cervical and middle thirds after restoration at 7 days. Clinical performance was assessed using FDI criteria at baseline and after 6, 12, and 18 months. Data were analyzed using paired Student's t-tests and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests (α = 0.05).
Results:
No significant differences between the one-shade and multi-shade composites were detected for ΔEab or ΔE00 in either objective color comparison (p > 0.05). At 18 months, retention rates were 98.4% for the one-shade composite and 100% for the multi-shade composite, with no significant difference between materials. No significant differences were observed for the remaining functional, biological, or esthetic FDI criteria, except color match (A3), for which the multi-shade composite showed a higher frequency of clinically excellent/very good scores (p = 0.008). All restorations evaluated for color match remained clinically acceptable.
Conclusions:
The one-shade flowable composite showed favorable 18-month clinical performance, with no significant differences in objective color measurements compared with the multi-shade composite. However, visual color matching favored the multi-shade material at 18 months, although all restorations evaluated for color match remained clinically acceptable.
Clinical Significance:
One-shade flowable composites may simplify NCCL restorations by eliminating shade selection while maintaining favorable clinical performance and clinically acceptable color match.