Epidemiology, treatment patterns, and outcomes in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia: a systematic review
Related Experiment Videos
Mairead Kearney1, Jason Hoffman2, Laura Cilek3
1Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.
Introduction:
Current global data on epidemiology, treatment patterns, outcomes, and care pathways for patients with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN) are needed.
Methods:
A systematic review included publications from Embase and Medline (interventional: 2005-2025; observational: 2021-2025) and conference abstracts (2022-2024). Benign gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD) studies, case reports, and case series were excluded. Treatment response rates and 95% CIs were calculated from aggregated data.
Results:
Of 117 included studies, 66.7% (n=78) were cohort studies; 54.7% (n=64) were conducted in Asia. GTN incidence from GTD varied from 6.2% in the UK to 16.8% across Asian studies. Methotrexate and dactinomycin were the most common real-world first-line treatments in low-risk GTN. Second-line and high-risk patients' treatment included diverse multiagent regimens and immunotherapy. Across trials, first-line treatment response with dactinomycin (82.9%) was higher than methotrexate (70.5%); in observational studies, response was similar and inversely associated with GTN risk score. Nausea and other gastrointestinal events were more common with dactinomycin than methotrexate.
Discussion:
Incidence of GTN varied by region and setting. Consensus supports methotrexate or dactinomycin as first-line therapy in low-risk GTN. Treatment options were more diverse in high-risk GTN and later-line regimens. Unmet needs to improve response rates and minimize toxicity persist.