Surgical Outcomes for Intermittent Exotropia in a Tertiary Hospital in Manila, Philippines
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Surgical Correction for Pediatric Epiblepharon and Trichiasis
Published on: July 8, 2025
Pierre Aldwin L Arceo1, Alvina Pauline D Santiago1,2,3,4, Aramis B Torrefranca1,5
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Philippine General Hospital, University of the Philippines Manila, Manila, Philippines.
Background:
Spontaneous resolution is infrequent, and surgery remains the mainstay for management of intermittent exotropia [X(T)]. Commonly performed procedures to address the exodeviation are (1) bilateral lateral rectus muscle recessions (BLR), (2) unilateral lateral rectus recession with medial rectus resection (monocular R&R), and three- or four-muscle surgery. Despite the different surgical options available, there is still debate as to the most effective surgical treatment for X(T).
Objective:
We are interested in describing the outcomes of various strabismus surgeries for X(T) from a local tertiary hospital perspective in the Philippines.
Methods:
This is a single-center retrospective chart review study conducted at the Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences of the Philippine General Hospital.
Results:
A total of 25 patients were included in the study, with ages ranging from 4 to 49 years, averaging 5 ± 7.5 years at deviation onset in a predominantly female population (n = 17, 68%). Basic exotropia was the most common type (n = 23, 92%). Surgical outcomes were success (n = 15, 60 %), recurrence (n = 9, 36%), and overcorrection (n = 1, 4%). The most commonly performed procedure was unilateral medial rectus resection-lateral rectus recession (monocular R & R) (n = 11, 44%). Generally, the choice of procedure did not influence success (p-value = 0.968).
Conclusion:
In summary, our study demonstrated that surgical interventions for X(T), primarily lateral rectus muscle recessions and medial rectus muscle resections, showed variable success rates, with recurrences observable beginning at 3 months post-operatively. The study acknowledged limitations, particularly a small sample size and challenges with follow-up, cautioning against overgeneralizing results. Despite these limitations, the research contributes to understanding local trends in X(T) surgical outcomes.
