Accuracy of Provisional Reports by Radiology Residents on Call
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Radiation Planning Assistant - A Web-based Tool to Support High-quality Radiotherapy in Clinics with Limited Resources
Published on: October 6, 2023
Mariam Dean1, Hammad Qadi2, Ali Rana3
1Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, Wrightington, Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, GBR.
Abstract:
Background Out-of-hours (OOH) CT and MRI examinations at our institution are provisionally reported by on-call radiology residents and used to guide overnight patient management. We aimed to quantify the overnight discrepancy rate between provisional resident reports and subsequent consultant reports, and explore associations between discrepancies and resident grade, study type, and reporting time. Methods This registered service evaluation retrospectively reviewed all consecutive CT and MRI examinations provisionally reported overnight by radiology residents between 13 June 2022 and 3 July 2022. Provisional reports were compared with the final consultant reports. Discrepancies were categorised as minor, significant, or major using predefined criteria by an ST4 radiology resident. Results In total, 993 imaging examinations were included. The overall discrepancy rate was 144 (14.5%). Major and significant discrepancies comprised 56 of 993 (5.6%) examinations and were considered potentially management-altering. Discrepancy rates varied significantly by imaging speciality (chi-square (χ²) test, p < 0.001): body imaging (21.6%), musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging (17.2%), neuro-radiological imaging (11.7%), and vascular imaging (5.4%). No statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident training grade (χ² test, p = 0.48) or one-hour reporting time block (χ² test, p = 0.37). Conclusion This service evaluation showed that provisional radiology reporting is associated with a meaningful discrepancy burden, paying careful attention to variation across imaging specialities. Notably, no statistically significant association was identified between discrepancy rates and resident seniority or time of reporting. Timely consultant review, structured feedback and targeted quality improvement with re-audit will support safe and accurate OOH reporting.
Related Concept Videos
Radiological Investigation I: X-ray and CT
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
Here's an overview of each type:
Telephone Orders
Radiological Investigation II: MRI and Ventilation Perfusion Scan
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Ventilation Perfusion Scans are two radiological investigations that offer detailed diagnostic images of the body, particularly lung structures.
MRI
MRI uses magnetic fields and radiofrequency signals to distinguish between normal and abnormal tissues. This technology provides a more detailed diagnostic image than CT scans, enabling it to characterize pulmonary nodules, stage bronchogenic carcinoma, and evaluate inflammatory activity in...
SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Standardized methods of communication have been developed to ensure that information is...
Types of Reports II: Incident or Occurrence Report
Purposes:
In the healthcare industry, reports play a crucial role in documenting incidents within an agency. The primary objective of these reports is to ensure patient safety, uphold the...
Radiological Investigation III: Pulmonary Angiogram and PET Scan
Pulmonary Angiogram
A Pulmonary Angiogram is an invasive procedure involving injecting a contrast medium through a catheter threaded into the pulmonary artery or the right side of the heart to visualize the pulmonary vasculature. Computed Tomography (CT) scans have mainly replaced this...