Research progress on bowel preparation regimens before colonoscopy: a narrative review
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

E-Patient Counseling Trial (E-PACO): Computer Based Education versus Nurse Counseling for Patients to Prepare for Colonoscopy
Published on: August 1, 2019
Xiang Liao1, Yu Song1, Yazhi He1
1Endoscopy Center, Deyang People's Hospital, Deyang, Sichuan, China.
Abstract:
Adequate bowel preparation is the single most important determinant of colonoscopy quality, yet suboptimal preparation affects up to one-quarter of colonoscopies, leading to repeat procedures, increased health-system costs, and health disparities. This narrative review synthesizes the current evidence on bowel preparation regimens through a public health lens, organized around four interconnected dimensions: cleansing efficacy, safety, tolerability, and population-specific applicability. We define and classify preparation regimens by volume (high-volume ≥4 L, low-volume 2-<4 L, ultra-low-volume <2 L) and administration schedule (split-dose, same-day). Low-volume, split-dose formulations achieve non-inferior cleansing efficacy to high-volume 4L polyethylene glycol (PEG) regimens, with improved patient tolerability and compliance. The Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS) is the most widely adopted assessment instrument; commonly used adequate preparation is defined as total BBPS ≥6 with each segment ≥2, although definitions vary across studies. PEG-based preparations maintain the most favorable safety profile, particularly in patients with renal or cardiovascular comorbidities, while sodium phosphate carries a small but clinically significant risk of acute phosphate nephropathy. Special populations-including older adults with frailty and polypharmacy, patients with inflammatory bowel disease, and those with diabetes-require tailored preparation strategies. Emerging evidence on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs), linaclotide, simethicone, dietary optimization, and artificial intelligence (AI)-based bowel preparation assessment is critically evaluated. Health system implications, including the impact of inadequate preparation on resource utilization, adherence barriers linked to health literacy, and equity considerations, are examined. The review concludes that no single regimen is universally optimal; personalized preparation strategies integrating risk stratification, AI-assisted quality assessment, and evidence-based adjunctive protocols represent the most promising path toward improving colonoscopy outcomes at the population level.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Lower GI Series: Barium Enema
Procedure Details
The examination begins by inserting a lubricated rectal tube into the patient's rectum to administer a radiopaque barium solution. The barium flow is carefully...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to: