Does blastocyst transfer have a higher live birth rate than cleavage-stage embryo transfer in patients with delayed in vitro blastocyst development?
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Human Blastocyst Biopsy and Vitrification
Published on: July 26, 2019
Jing Gao1, Haiyang Li1, XiaoKang Li2
1Reproductive Center, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, China.
Research Question:
When embryo cohorts exhibit delayed blastocyst development, with only slow-developing day 6 (D6) blastocysts available for transfer, does blastocyst transfer achieve a higher live birth rate (LBR) than cleavage-stage embryo transfer?
Methods:
A modified blastocyst culture strategy was applied in freeze-all cycles. Specifically, one or two good-quality embryos were cryopreserved on day 3 (D3) as a backup, while an equal or greater number of good-quality embryos were cultured to the blastocyst stage. Among freeze-all patients managed with this strategy, 275 patients were identified who had only D6 blastocysts available for transfer, with no transferable day 5 (D5) blastocysts following extended in vitro culture. Cumulative LBR after one oocyte retrieval over 2 years and pregnancy outcomes in the first frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles were compared between groups with priority transfer of backup D3 cleavage-stage embryos versus top-graded D6 blastocysts.
Results:
The cumulative LBR was not significantly different between the group with priority transfer of backup cryopreserved D3 embryos and the group with priority transfer of top-quality D6 blastocysts [50.6% vs. 48.4%; adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 0.759; 95% CI, 0.384-1.499; p = 0.427]. In the first FET cycles, transfer of top-graded D6 blastocysts did not yield a higher LBR compared with transfer of backup cryopreserved D3 embryos [36.3% vs. 43.5%; aOR, 0.601; 95% CI, 0.299-1.208; p = 0.153]. Subgroup analyses showed no significant differences in LBR between the two groups following either single embryo/blastocyst transfer (SET/SBT) (37.0% vs. 36.4%; aOR, 0.922; 95% CI, 0.234-3.634; p = 0.907) or double embryo/blastocyst transfer (DET/DBT) (35.4% vs. 44.6%; aOR, 0.493; 95% CI, 0.213-1.138; p = 0.097). No statistically significant differences were observed in clinical pregnancy rate, obstetric complications, or neonatal outcomes between the two groups in the first FET cycles.
Conclusions:
When embryo cohorts exhibit delayed development at the blastocyst stage, blastocyst transfer does not result in a higher LBR and therefore may not confer an advantage in achieving live birth sooner compared with the transfer of good-quality cleavage-stage embryos.
More Related Videos
09:35Modified MicroSecure Vitrification: A Safe, Simple and Highly Effective Cryopreservation Procedure for Human Blastocysts
Published on: March 2, 2017
08:28Morphometric Protocol for the Objective Assessment of Blastocyst Behavior During Vitrification and Warming Steps
Published on: February 28, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cleavage and Blastulation
In Vitro Fertilization
The IVF process begins with ovarian stimulation, during which reproductive endocrinologists prescribe hormonal medications to stimulate the ovaries to produce multiple eggs instead of the single...