Strategic mining on Sámi lands: Risks for Indigenous rights
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Deployment and Retrieval of Mineral Samplers
Published on: January 20, 2026
Rasmus Kløcker Larsen1, Johanna Westeson2, Carl Österlin2
1Stockholm Environment Institute, Virkesvägen 1a, 4tr, 120 30, Stockholm, Sweden. rasmus.klocker.larsen@sei.org.
Abstract:
This paper contributes to just transition debates, providing novel evidence about how emerging critical mineral governance plays out vis-à-vis state obligations to protect Sámi rights. Focus is on the designation of strategic extraction projects under the European Union's Critical Raw Materials Act and the role of negotiated agreements between Sámi herding communities and mining companies. Using Swedish state-owned mining company LKAB's proposed Per Geijer project on traditional Sámi lands as case study, we conduct a legal analysis drawing on Indigenous rights, specifically the state duty to seek and obtain free, prior and informed consent. Findings demonstrate inherent flaws in the strategic project mechanism and corporate breaches of international standards-with the agreement between LKAB and the herding community serving to contain criticism and distract from continued power imbalances. We argue that strategic mining projects perpetuate a colonial state-industry nexus with an urgent need to incorporate rigorous human rights safeguards.
Related Concept Videos
Threats to Biodiversity
Water and Mineral Acquisition
Acid Mine Drainage
Microbial Leaching
Quarrying of Stone
One common method involves using a diamond belt saw to cut large blocks from the quarry face. These blocks can be about 50 feet long and 12 feet high. After the initial vertical cut, drilling is performed at the base of the block.
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...

