Difficult-to-manage psoriatic arthritis: Prevalence, phenotype, and clinical burden in real-world practice: insights from the SCQM registry
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Measuring Psoriasis Severity at Home
Published on: March 1, 2024
Gehad G Elsehrawy1, Delphine S Courvoisier2, Laure Brülhart-Bletsas3
1Department of Rheumatology, Geneva University Hospital, University of Geneva, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, Geneva, Switzerland; Department of Physical Medicine, Rheumatology and Rehabilitation, faculty of medicine, Suez Canal University, 4.5 Km Ring Road, Ismailia, Egypt.
Objectives:
To apply consensus-based, difficult-to-treat definitions of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and to investigate the prevalence, demographics, and clinical characteristics of difficult-to-manage (D2M)/complex-to-manage (C2M) and treatment-refractory (TR) PsA.
Methods:
Retrospective analysis of data derived from the prospective, multicentre, longitudinal Swiss registry was conducted. Patients were eligible if they initiated their advanced therapy after inclusion in the registry and had ≥12 months of follow-up. Group for Research and Assessment of Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) definitions were applied to identify cases of C2M/D2M and TR.
Results:
From 2493 patients, 30.4% / 2.6% fulfilled the GRAPPA criteria for C2M/TR disease, while 17% / 7.3% met the D2M/TR EULAR criteria, respectively. At baseline, C2M/D2M patients were more frequently women (p < 0.001), smokers, had higher body mass index (BMI), and presented more comorbidities. C2M/D2M patients also demonstrated higher inflammatory markers, higher prevalence of enthesitis, more axial involvement, more severe psoriasis, and worse disease activity scores compared with non-C2M/non-D2M patients (p ≤ 0.001). However, there were no significant differences regarding the prevalence of HLA-B27, dactylitis, nail disease, or other extra-musculoskeletal manifestations. Within both criteria, the TR subgroup showed higher BMI, swollen joint counts, and tender entheses. D2M-TR patients showed significant differences regarding the inflammatory markers, quality of life, and disease activity measures, compared to non-TR D2M patients (p < 0.05).
Conclusion:
Applying the GRAPPA and EULAR definitions in a large real-world cohort identified distinct clinical and inflammatory profiles in the C2M/D2M and TR groups, highlighting the need for phenotype-tailored management strategies.