Evolutionary diversity and structural comparison of the FimA adhesin in Porphyromonas gingivalis
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 31, 2026

Porphyromonas gingivalis as a Model Organism for Assessing Interaction of Anaerobic Bacteria with Host Cells
Published on: December 17, 2015
Josefa Nuñez-Belmar1, Luis Valverde2, Fabian Herrmann3
1Integrative Genomics Ph.D. Program, Universidad Mayor, Camino La Pirámide 5750, Huechuraba, Santiago 8580745, Chile; GICAO - Grupo de Investigación en Ciencias Aplicadas a la Odontología, Carrera de Odontología, Universidad Autónoma de Chile, Avenida Alemania 1090, Temuco, Chile.
Abstract:
Porphyromonas gingivalis is a heterogeneous oral pathogen whose major fimbrial subunit FimA occurs as genotypes linked to adhesion differences. We asked whether fimA diversification tracks the phylogeny, carries selection signatures and varies structurally. We analyzed 99 Porphyromonas assemblies: genotypes were mapped onto the core-genome phylogeny, nucleotide diversity compared with 1248 core genes, recombination screened with GARD, and codon-level selection tested with FEL and MEME, with and without multiple-hit models. Genotype I and IV precursors were characterized by mass spectrometry, SEC-MALS and far-UV circular dichroism; rigid docking used β1-derived peptides and a truncated β1 construct. Genotype was only partially coupled to lineage: 27 tree changes against five expected under clade structure. fimA had Tajima's D = 1.29, 13th of 1247 families, against a negative background; under lineage-balanced sampling of reconstructed alignments its median position fell to the 96th percentile, and within one lineage it was negative. GARD placed two breakpoints and the multiple-hit model fitted better. Ten codons met p ≤ 0.1 for diversifying selection in two or more analyses, none survived Benjamini-Hochberg correction, while 119 to 132 codons met the same nominal threshold for purifying selection and 12 to 18 of those held at q ≤ 0.05. The best supported were V193 and A231, with episodic MEME signals at D52, S55, A76, T227 and A306, and all ten lie outside the mapped epithelial cell-binding region. Both behaved as monomers of 38.3 and 38.0 kDa, their predicted structures superposed at 0.73 Å, and docking gave no convergent interface. The position of fimA depends on the sampling scheme, so these data demonstrate neither balancing nor host-associated selection, and genotype-dependent β1-integrin recognition requires experimental testing.
Related Concept Videos
Fimbriae, Pili, and Axial Filaments
Surface Appendages of Archaea
The Oral Microbiota
Colonisation of Pathogens
Mechanism of Filopodia Formation
Their main function is to guide migrating cells during normal tissue morphogenesis or cancer metastasis by recognizing and making initial contacts with the extracellular matrix. However, they can also act as stationary cell anchors or help to establish communication...