Event-to-Payment Latency in Physicians With Imaging-Related Allegations: NPDB Reports Processed 2004-2025
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2026

Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
Amir Hassankhani1, Melika Amoukhteh2, Cem Bilgin3
1Department of Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA.
Objective:
To characterize event-to-payment/report-processing latency among physicians with imaging-related allegations.
Methods:
This retrospective cross-sectional study included National Practitioner Data Bank physician payment reports processed in 2004-2025, excluding state-fund reports. Imaging-related allegations were identified in either specific-allegation field. Latency equaled original report-processing year minus alleged-event end year, using onset year when end year was unavailable. Adjusted models included report characteristics and jurisdiction, with practitioner-clustered standard errors. Complementary analyses examined events in 2004-2010 and jurisdiction random effects.
Results:
Among 199,060 eligible reports, 1,980 involved imaging-related allegations (1,852 physicians). Median latency was 4 years (IQR, 3-6); 47.0% had latency ≥5 years. The proportions were 43.7% (2004-2009), 42.9% (2010-2015), 46.1% (2016-2020), and 55.7% (2021-2025). Adjusted differences were +0.66 years for permanent injury and +0.48 for death versus nonpermanent injury; +0.38 for outpatient and +0.49 for mixed settings versus inpatient care; and +1.56 for judgment versus settlement/other. All corresponding 95% confidence intervals excluded zero. Age was associated with -0.16 years per decade-category increment. Among 562 reports for events in 2004-2010, median latency was 4 years and 44.1% had latency ≥5 years. The adjusted payment ratio per additional latency year was 1.021 (95% CI, 0.997-1.044; P=0.082).
Discussion:
Paid reports involving physicians with imaging-related allegations frequently reflected care delivered years earlier. The payment association was small, imprecise, and not statistically significant. These selected paid-report data do not estimate litigation duration, future payment risk, or radiologist-specific performance.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacovigilance
This process, termed pharmacovigilance, aims to detect, evaluate, and minimize harmful effects related to medication use. The data collection for pharmacovigilance depends on spontaneous reporting systems, where healthcare professionals or patients voluntarily report suspected ADRs.
In some cases, there...
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation