DIV/S3-S4 loop length determines Nav1.8 insensitivity to the scorpion α-like toxin BmK I
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2026

Structure-Guided Design and Development of Novel Cyclophilin A Inhibitors and Ganoderiol-F Derivatives: An In-Silico Approach
Published on: June 23, 2026
Lu Zhao1, Xinghua Feng2, Lele Tang3
1Institute of Physiology, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, 200031, China; Nanxiang Branch of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai, 201802, China; Putuo Hospital, Shanghai University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai, 200062, China.
Abstract:
Nav1.8, a voltage-gated sodium channel predominantly expressed in dorsal root ganglion neurons, is a key mediator of pain signaling and an established therapeutic target. However, its direct interaction with BmK I, an α-like scorpion toxin considered to be the primary factor in scorpion sting pain, has remained uncertain. By whole-cell patch-clamp recordings, we evaluated the sensitivity of rat Nav1.8 (rNav1.8) to BmK I and generated a panel of rNav1.5-based mutants to investigate the functional role of two extra residues (leucine-glutamate, LE) in the DIV/S3-S4 extracellular loop. At 300 nM concentration, BmK I did not significantly slow the inactivation of rNav1.8 (with no significant change in I5ms/Ipeak, P > 0.05). Insertion of LE, or its substitution with leucine-glutamine (LQ), glutamate-histidine (EH), aspartate (D), alanine-alanine (AA), or alanine (A), at the equivalent position of rNav1.5 consistently attenuated BmK I efficacy, yet none of the mutants became completely insensitive. Notably, insertion of alanine produced a similar effect, implicating steric hindrance, rather than side-chain chemistry, as the primary determinant. Conversely, deletion of LE from rNav1.8 fully restored BmK I sensitivity. In marked contrast, the classical α-toxin AaH II still markedly delayed inactivation of both rNav1.5-LE and rNav1.5-AA, revealing that BmK I and AaH II rely on distinct conformational features within receptor site-3. Together, these findings indicate that the length of the DIV/S3-S4 loop, rather than the chemical identity of the inserted residues, is the primary factor correlating with rNav1.8 resistance to BmK I. This correlation is consistent with a steric hindrance mechanism, although direct structural evidence is not provided by the current functional data. Nonetheless, our results offer structural clues for the development of subtype-selective sodium channel modulators.
Related Concept Videos
Radical Reactivity: Steric Effects
Along with electronic factors, steric factors also account...
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Mechanism of Action
Reversible inhibitors like edrophonium bind to a specific part of the enzyme called the anionic catalytic site. They form noncovalent bonds, which means they are not strongly attached to the enzyme. This creates a temporary and less stable enzyme–inhibitor complex, leading to...
Indirect-Acting Cholinergic Agonists: Chemistry and Structure-Activity Relationship
Reversible inhibitors display short to medium durations of action. Short-acting agents include simple alcohols with...
ortho–para-Directing Activators: –CH3, –OH, –⁠NH2, –OCH3
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...
Regioselectivity of Electrophilic Additions to Alkenes: Markovnikov's Rule
The hydrohalogenation of an unsymmetrical alkene can yield two haloalkane products, depending on which vinylic carbon takes up the halogen. However, one product usually predominates, where hydrogen adds to the vinylic carbon bearing the...
