Informing sample size and power calculations for clone-censor-weight analyses: a Monte Carlo simulation study of the variance inflation factor relative to the underlying target trial
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 1, 2026

The Replica Set Method: A High-throughput Approach to Quantitatively Measure Caenorhabditis elegans Lifespan
Published on: June 29, 2018
1ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Background:
Clone-censor-weighting (CCW) is a causal inference method used in target trial emulation in settings in which the time of application of the treatment occurs during follow-up. An important component of study design is determining the sample size required for a specified level of statistical power or to determine the statistical power associated with a specific sample size. Determining statistical power is relatively straightforward for the underlying randomized controlled trial (RCT) that one is emulating. In contrast, conducting power and sample size calculations for observational studies that employ CCW is not straightforward because the analysis incorporates inverse probability of censoring weights, which are only known at the analysis phase, and not during the design phase.
Methods:
Monte Carlo simulations (270 scenarios varying sample size, treatment prevalence, threshold for defining early treatment, and covariate-treatment odds ratios) were used to estimate the variance inflation factor (VIF) of a CCW analysis compared to the underlying target RCT, across two estimands: the risk difference and the relative risk.
Results:
In settings with 10 baseline covariates, the use of a CCW design tended to result in more precise estimation of risk differences and relative risks compared to the underlying RCT when the magnitude of confounding was low to moderate. The magnitude of the VIF depended on treatment prevalence, sample size, the time horizon at which risk was estimated, and the strength of the baseline covariates' association with treatment initiation. In secondary simulations, it was observed that the VIF comparing a CCW design to the underlying RCT tended to increase as the number of baseline covariates increased.
Conclusions:
Researchers designing CCW studies can use the simulation results and the accompanying R code, available in a public GitHub repository, to obtain study-specific VIF estimates for incorporation into a priori power calculations.
Related Concept Videos
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Censoring Survival Data
Sample Size Calculation
The sample size for the given experiment or sampling effort is fundamental to any study design. Sample size decides the number of...
Testing a Claim about Standard Deviation
The hypothesis testing for the claim of population standard deviation (or variance) requires the data and samples to be random and unbiased. The population distribution also must be normal. There is no specific requirement on the sample size as the estimation is based on the chi-square distribution.
As a first step, the hypothesis (null and alternative) concerning the claim about...

