Why some emergency maneuvers succeed: Interpretable behavior graphs from expert drivers to automated control
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 4, 2026

Eye Tracking During A Complex Aviation Task For Insights Into Information Processing
Published on: April 4, 2025
Yixin Zhu1, Xiaocong Zhao1, Yiru Liu1
1The Key Laboratory of Road and Traffic Engineering, Ministry of Education, Tongji University, 4800 Cao'an Road, Jiading District, Shanghai, 201804, China.
Abstract:
Emergency handling is among the hardest capabilities for automated driving. Safe evasion demands staged, anticipatory, and tightly coupled longitudinal-lateral actions, yet the expert logic behind such maneuvers is scarce, hard to label by skill, and locked in continuous control signals that obscure why some maneuvers succeed and others fail. This study introduces the Driving Behavior Graph (DBG), an interpretable, probabilistic representation that turns scarce expert demonstrations into reusable knowledge linking human expert decision logic to machine-executable control. Through a two-stage procedure, we screen 25 expert drivers from 99 candidates and collect 400 driver-in-the-loop trials across four emergency scenarios (jaywalking, cut-out, cut-in, merge-in) on a virtual-reality platform. Control signals are segmented with a Hierarchical Dirichlet Process Hidden Semi-Markov Model, mapped to a scenario-specific semantic grid, and assembled into a probabilistic DBG of behavior chains and transitions. The DBG shows that expert emergency behavior is proactive and phased: the first semantic divergence occurred further upstream (semantic bifurcation at longitudinal positions of approximately 55 vs. 115 m in the cut-out scenario), longitudinal and lateral control are coordinated, and the vehicle is deliberately recovered after the conflict; it further localizes the bifurcation points where excellent and poor episodes diverge. Notably, questionnaire-based screening scores were not significantly correlated with objective emergency performance in the present sample, suggesting that screening alone may not fully capture competence in the tested safety-critical scenarios. To close the loop, DBG-derived primitives are synthesized into reference trajectories that guide a model predictive controller, which reproduces expert-like earlier lateral evasion (p < 0.001) and a deliberate safety-over-compliance trade-off, and runs in a vehicle-in-the-loop deployment on a Level-3 automated test vehicle. To support reproducibility, the skill-screened expert emergency-driving dataset is publicly available at https://zenodo.org/records/20710939.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems
In the absence of...
Controller Configurations
Control-system compensation involves various configurations, most commonly series or cascade compensation, in which the controller aligns...
Control Systems
At the heart...
Control Systems: Applications
In modern vehicles, control systems manage various functions to enhance performance and safety. The steering wheel and accelerator are primary inputs in a car's control system. The direction...
Root-Locus Method
This system can be represented by a block diagram,...
Signal Flow Graphs
In a signal-flow graph, branches denote the system's transfer functions, while nodes represent the signals. The direction of signal flow is indicated by arrows, with the corresponding...

