Guided P2Y12 inhibitor selection after rapid CYP2C19 genotyping in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2026

Interventional Diagnostic Procedure: A Practical Guide for the Assessment of Coronary Vascular Function
Published on: March 15, 2022
Cameron D Thomas1,2, Jean G Malave1, Claudio Laudani3,4
1Department of Pharmacotherapy & Translational Research and Center for Pharmacogenomics and Precision Medicine, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Background:
Dual antiplatelet therapy remains the standard treatment following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). While prasugrel and ticagrelor offer consistent antiplatelet effects, they increase bleeding risk compared with clopidogrel, which requires CYP2C19 bioactivation.
Aims:
This study aimed to evaluate the impact of rapid CYP2C19 genotyping at the time of PCI on P2Y12 inhibitor selection and clinical outcomes in real-world patients.
Methods:
A total of 974 patients who underwent PCI and rapid CYP2C19 genotyping and received P2Y12 inhibitor treatment were included. P2Y12 inhibitor selection, P2Y12 inhibitor switching, major atherothrombotic events (MAE; a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, ischaemic stroke, stent thrombosis, or unstable angina requiring revascularisation), and bleeding events were assessed throughout the first year post-PCI. Time-varying Cox regression analysis was performed to assess event risk in patients treated with clopidogrel (reference) versus prasugrel/ticagrelor after stratifying by loss-of-function (LOF) status and adjusting for stratum-specific confounders.
Results:
Clopidogrel was prescribed more frequently at discharge among CYP2C19 non-LOF versus LOF carriers (43% [296/691] vs 31% [87/283]; p<0.001). The median duration of follow-up was 359 days (interquartile range [IQR] 190-362 days). Among LOF allele carriers de-escalating to clopidogrel, the median de-escalation time was 180 days (IQR 92-354 days). MAE were not significantly different between P2Y12 inhibitor regimens after stratifying by LOF status (LOF-prasugrel/ticagrelor [n=147] vs LOF-clopidogrel [n=136]: adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.87 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.36-2.10]; non-LOF-prasugrel/ticagrelor [n=272] vs non-LOF-clopidogrel [n=419]: adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI: 0.67-2.36). No significant differences in Bleeding Academic Research Consortium bleeding events were observed.
Conclusions:
This real-world study shows that, among LOF carriers managed with rapid CYP2C19 genotyping and delayed de-escalation, ischaemic and bleeding event rates were not significantly different between those taking clopidogrel versus those taking prasugrel/ticagrelor, though findings should be interpreted cautiously.
Related Concept Videos
Pharmacogenetics of Phase I Enzymes: Cytochrome P450 Isozymes
Antiplatelet Drugs: Prostaglandin Synthesis, P2Y12 and Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors
Prostaglandin synthesis inhibitors, exemplified by the widely known aspirin, wield their power by irreversibly acetylating...
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Pharmacogenetic Phenotypes: Alterations in Pharmacokinetics, Drug Targets and Biologic Milieu
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Prostacyclin Receptor Agonists
These agonists bind to the IPR receptor situated on the plasma membrane of the pulmonary artery smooth muscle cells. This binding triggers a cascade of reactions known as the GS-AC-cAMP-PKA pathway. This pathway results in the relaxation of smooth muscle...
Treatment for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers
TKIs, such as imatinib (Gleevec), are particularly effective in tackling the growth and mitogenic factors that become upregulated in PAH patients. These factors contribute to the...