Bayesian Neural Networks for Uncertainty‑Aware Toxicity Prediction of Metallic Nanoparticles
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 5, 2026

Microglia as a Surrogate Biosensor to Determine Nanoparticle Neurotoxicity
Published on: October 25, 2016
Karla Mosquera1, Lenin Ramirez1
1School of Biological Sciences and Engineering, Yachay Tech University, Urcuquí, Ibarra, Imbabura, Ecuador.
Abstract:
Nanoparticle cytotoxicity prediction remains challenging due to the complex interplay of physicochemical properties and experimental conditions, compounded by the critical need for uncertainty quantification in safety assessments. Here, we present a hybrid computational framework integrating Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) feature engineering with Bayesian Neural Networks (BNNs) to predict metallic nanoparticle toxicity while explicitly quantifying predictive uncertainty. Using a curated dataset of 1,363 experimental records (25 nanoparticle formulations) from multiple in vitro studies, with every model evaluated on formulations unseen during training, we implemented a three-stage pipeline: (i) domain-guided preprocessing with multicollinearity assessment, (ii) benchmarking of deterministic classifiers (Random Forest, SVM, Multi-Layer Perceptron and three simpler models), and (iii) variational Bayesian inference for probabilistic classification. In repeated formulation-grouped cross-validation Random Forest discriminated best (ROC-AUC = 0.974), followed by logistic regression (0.967), which was better calibrated on held-out formulations (ECE 0.046 versus 0.130). The BNN discriminated well (ROC-AUC = 0.979) but underestimated toxicity at the 0.5 threshold (recall 0.520), while providing individual prediction uncertainty estimates from the variational posterior. Predictive uncertainty identified most misclassified predictions (AUROC = 0.92) but did not rise for samples outside the training descriptor space, which were detected by leverage. Dual-criterion applicability domain filtering (leverage and uncertainty thresholds) retained 44.2% of test samples (52 of the 125 toxic ones), achieving 0.942 recall and a 0.058 false negative rate, and flagged the remaining 55.8% for confirmatory testing. Impact statement: uncertainty-aware models evaluated on unseen formulations can separate nanoparticle cytotoxicity predictions usable for screening from those that require confirmatory testing.

