Distinct proteomic and acylproteomic adaptations to succinate dehydrogenase loss in two cell contexts
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2026

Simultaneous Affinity Enrichment of Two Post-Translational Modifications for Quantification and Site Localization
Published on: February 27, 2020
Sherry X Zhou1, Benjamin Madden2, M Cristine Charlesworth2
1Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA; Medical Scientist Training Program, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN, USA.
Abstract:
The tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle and electron transport chain (ETC) are key metabolic pathways required for cellular ATP production. Though loss of these components impairs cell survival, such defects can paradoxically promote tumorigenesis. One example is loss of succinate dehydrogenase (SDH), which functions in both the TCA cycle and as Complex II of the ETC. Mutations in SDH subunits can cause pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PPGL), rare hereditary neuroendocrine tumors of chromaffin cells in the adrenal gland and the nerve ganglia. Why tumor formation upon SDH loss is limited to certain tissues remains unclear. We hypothesized that the metabolic and proteomic perturbations resulting from SDH loss are cell-type specific, favoring survival of chromaffin cells. We comprehensively examined the proteomic, acetylproteomic, and succinylproteomic effects of SDH loss in two cell models, immortalized mouse chromaffin cells (imCCs) and immortalized mouse embryonic fibroblasts (iMEFs). Perturbations in metabolite levels were determined by mass spectrometry. Effects of SDH loss on fatty acid β-oxidation (FAO) were assessed by stable isotope tracing and pharmacologic inhibition. SDH-loss imCCs show significant upregulation of mitochondrial proteins, including TCA cycle and FAO enzymes, with pronounced downregulation of nuclear proteins. Both imCCs and iMEFs demonstrate significant energy deficiency upon SDH loss, but FAO activity is uniquely increased in SDH-loss imCCs. While SDH loss increases both lysine-reactive acetyl-CoA and succinyl-CoA, SDH-loss imCCs and iMEFs show disproportionate hyperacetylation but mixed succinylation. Surprisingly, SDH-loss imCCs, but not iMEFs, display disproportionate hypoacetylation and hyposuccinylation of mitochondrial proteins.
More Related Videos
12:49Quantification of Site-specific Protein Lysine Acetylation and Succinylation Stoichiometry Using Data-independent Acquisition Mass Spectrometry
Published on: April 4, 2018
08:04A New Approach for the Comparative Analysis of Multiprotein Complexes Based on 15N Metabolic Labeling and Quantitative Mass Spectrometry
Published on: March 13, 2014