Simulation-based Bayesian deep learning enables uncertainty-aware tumor fraction estimation in cell-free DNA
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2026

Quantifying the Brain Metastatic Tumor Micro-Environment using an Organ-On-A Chip 3D Model, Machine Learning, and Confocal Tomography
Published on: August 16, 2020
Hadas Volkov1,2, Maria Raitses-Gurevich3, Meitar Grad4
1Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, 39040, Israel. hadasvol@mail.tau.ac.il.
Background:
Estimating tumor fraction from whole-genome cell-free DNA sequencing is critical for liquid biopsy, but is hampered by weak signals and baseline noise at low tumor fractions. Existing computational methods often require matched controls or large labeled datasets for training and lack uncertainty quantification. To address these gaps, we developed purNPE, a Bayesian deep-learning framework trained without labeled cancer cell-free DNA samples. Specifically, purNPE leverages a two-part generative model: one component simulates diverse tumor copy-number profiles based on evolutionary genealogies, while a second, data-driven component learns and replicates realistic sequencing background patterns from cancer-free cell-free DNA. By training a Neural Posterior Estimator on synthetic tumor profiles augmented with learned noise, purNPE performs amortized inference in milliseconds without needing a reference sample set at inference.
Results:
In a real-world pan-cancer cohort, purNPE achieved comparable performance with existing methods against an orthogonal mutant-allele-fraction proxy (MAE [Formula: see text]). In semi-synthetic and in silico experiments, purNPE showed calibrated uncertainty estimates and a dose-response across low tumor-fraction spike-ins, with separation of approximately 1% TF spike-ins from blanks under the evaluated conditions.
Conclusions:
This work provides a proof-of-concept framework for using simulation-based inference to derive calibrated, uncertainty-aware TF estimates. Larger prospective cohorts with stronger orthogonal ground truth are required before analytical sensitivity or clinical utility can be established.

