Operationalizing two UAE nursing education policy frameworks: a cross-walk for curriculum, assessment, and continuous program improvement
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 6, 2026

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
Published on: June 21, 2010
Fatma M Ibrahim1,2, Ghada Shahrour1,3, Ibrahim Al Faouri1,3
1RAK College of Nursing, RAK Medical and Health Sciences University, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.
Background:
The UAE Professional Practice Framework for Bachelor of Sciences in Nursing (BSN) Graduates and the national Outcome-Based Evaluation Framework (OBEF) address related but distinct questions. The first defines expected graduate competence; the second evaluates program and institutional outcomes. Programs need a practical method for using both documents together without treating institutional indicators as evidence of an individual learner's competence.
Purpose:
To develop a domain-level policy cross-walk and explain how nursing programs can use it to (1) create or refine curricula, (2) create or refine an integrated program of assessment, and (3) evaluate program quality and effectiveness.
Approach:
The three-author team conducted a structured analysis of the two national policy documents. The seven BSN domains and 38 standards were retained verbatim at domain and standard level. The team translated each domain into an observable graduate outcome, identified candidate direct evidence, and linked aggregated evidence to OBEF indicators only when the intended inference was compatible. Linkages were reviewed iteratively against predefined rules and resolved by consensus.
Results:
The cross-walk distinguishes three evidence roles: direct learner-performance evidence for feedback and progression; corroborating transition and stakeholder evidence; and distal program or institutional indicators. The combined model aligns the two policy documents and organizes application around curriculum, an integrated program of assessment, and program evaluation. Three tables provide the domain-level cross-walk, an evidence-to-decision guide, and a minimum institutional implementation record.
Conclusion:
The cross-walk offers an auditable starting architecture rather than a new national framework or validated assessment system. Local stakeholder review, staged piloting, monitoring of feasibility and equity, and documented continuous-improvement cycles are required before high-stakes use.
Related Concept Videos
Nursing Implementation
The five steps to implementing effective nursing care include reassessing the patient, reviewing and revising the existing nursing care plan, organizing the resources and care delivery, anticipating and preventing complications, and implementing nursing interventions.
Nursing Evaluation
Section...
Aims Of Nursing
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Nursing Clinical Information System
A Nursing Clinical Information System (NCIS) is a specialized type of healthcare information system tailored to meet the unique needs of nursing practice. It incorporates the principles of nursing informatics to streamline information management and improve the quality of care delivery.
Critical attributes of NCIS include: