Toward Machine Learning Enhancement of Accelerated Surface Hopping with Scaled Spin-Orbit Couplings
Related Experiment Videos
Jakub Martinka1,2, Mahesh Kumar Sit1, Pavlo O Dral3,4,5,6
1Heyrovský Institute, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic, v.v.i., Dolejškova 3, 18223Prague 8, Czech Republic.
Abstract:
Surface hopping (SH) methods are typically employed to simulate ultrafast nonadiabatic processes, but long time scales often remain beyond their reach. To address this, the accelerated SH scheme mitigates this limitation by scaling the driving forces of such processes, either nonadiabatic couplings (NACs) in the case of internal conversion or spin-orbit couplings (SOCs) for intersystem crossing. However, obtaining the actual time constant requires extrapolation from several ensembles of trajectories with different scaling factors. This introduces a significant computational demand, often restricting the number of trajectories per ensemble and, therefore, reducing the statistical confidence in the resulting time constant. In this work, we investigate the accelerated scheme using silaethylene (CH2SiH2) as a case study, evaluating various population fitting methods and extrapolation techniques. We trained machine learning models for potential energy surfaces (PESs) and NACs, and extended our Rotate-Predict-Rotate approach to fit SOCs. These models demonstrate high performance, yielding populations within the confidence interval of the reference MR-CISD/SA-CASSCF(2,2) data; however, the extrapolation itself is highly sensitive to the fitted time constants, leading to discrepancies in the final time constant. Finally, we showcase and discuss how ML models can enhance the reliability of an accelerated SH scheme.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Rolling Without Slipping
Conservation of Angular Momentum: Application