Conserved rhizosphere microbiomes and metabolic functions across diverse grapevine rootstocks: implications for plant elemental composition
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2026

The Terroir Concept Interpreted through Grape Berry Metabolomics and Transcriptomics
Published on: October 5, 2016
Joel F Swift1, Grace E Trello2, Zachary N Harris2,3
1Kansas Biological Survey & Center for Ecological Research, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA. joel.swift@ku.edu.
Background:
While grapevine rootstocks are essential to commercial viticulture, researchers still lack a complete understanding of how these root systems and their associated microbiomes influence the vine's mineral nutrition. Previous research has shown that rootstocks with similar pedigrees, reflecting the limited number of parental genotypes in the breeding pool, affect both the vine's elemental profile and microbiome composition. Here, we extend this work by surveying a broader diversity of rootstock genotypes representing distinct parentage groups across multiple scions and by assessing both functional and taxonomic correlations between the rhizosphere metagenome and vine elemental composition.
Results:
We used a rootstock diversity trial with ten rootstock genotypes grafted to one of two scions to simultaneously characterize the rhizosphere metagenome and elemental composition of both berries and roots. We found that elemental composition varied strongly among vine compartments, while scion and rootstock had comparatively minor effects. Berries of 'Cabernet Sauvignon' contained higher concentrations of boron, potassium, and phosphorus than those of 'Chardonnay'. Only three elements in root tissues differed among rootstock genotypes, and these differences were unrelated to genetic relatedness among rootstocks. Rhizosphere microbiome composition was also conserved across rootstocks, suggesting that diverse genotypes recruit a consistent microbial community with similar functional potential. By linking rhizosphere microbiome profiles with root elemental composition, we found that Streptomyces and Mesorhizobium were significantly associated with elemental patterns, showing negative correlations with a principal component heavily loaded for molybdenum, cadmium, potassium, and iron.
Conclusions:
Our findings suggest that vine compartment is a dominant influence on elemental composition, while rootstock genotypes have comparatively modest effects. Despite the overall conservation of the rhizosphere microbiome, specific microbial taxa were associated to elemental variation, highlighting potential microbe-element correlations that may influence nutrient dynamics in the grapevine rhizosphere. These results provide a step towards disentangling how root-associated microbes contribute to vine mineral nutrition, or vice versa, across diverse rootstock genotypes.
More Related Videos
07:34Profiling the Bacterial Community of Fermenting Traminette Grapes during Wine Production using Metagenomic Amplicon Sequencing
Published on: December 1, 2023
12:03Two-Dimensional Visualization and Quantification of Labile, Inorganic Plant Nutrients and Contaminants in Soil
Published on: September 1, 2020
Related Concept Videos
The Roles of Bacteria and Fungi in Plant Nutrition
Soil Microbial Ecology
Microbe-Plant Interactions
Key Elements for Plant Nutrition
Water and Mineral Acquisition
Microbes and Other Elemental Cycles