Researchers' perspectives on donor-level metadata collection and reporting for human tissue research
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 9, 2026

Working with Human Tissues for Translational Cancer Research
Published on: November 26, 2015
Rachel Liu-Galvin1, Kathy Tran2, Mishal Khan1
1Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, United States.
Introduction:
No widely adopted guidelines exist for collecting and reporting donor-level metadata in tissue-based research, which limits interpretability and reproducibility and may introduce bias. This study aimed to identify researchers' perspectives to inform ethical and appropriate metadata practices.
Materials And Methods:
Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 investigators from the Human BioMolecular Atlas Program. Thematic analysis using inductively derived codes identified metadata elements and perspectives on their collection and reporting.
Results:
Participants identified 80 metadata variables across six domains: demographic, sociodemographic, medical history, personally identifying information, cause of death, and tissue/organ data. Participants predominantly supported collection and reporting of demographics and medical history, whereas views on cause of death and sociodemographic data were mixed.
Conclusion:
These findings can inform the future development of ethical guidelines for donor-level metadata collection and reporting in tissue-based research. Future stakeholder engagement and consensus-building are needed to determine how individual metadata elements should be defined, collected, operationalized, and reported.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Ethics in Research
Archival Research

