Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Study Designs in Epidemiology01:20

Study Designs in Epidemiology

1.0K
Epidemiological study designs are fundamental tools for investigating the distribution, determinants, and control of health conditions in populations. They help researchers understand the relationships between exposures and outcomes, and they broadly fall into two categories: "observational" and "experimental" studies.
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
1.0K
Confounding in Epidemiological Studies01:27

Confounding in Epidemiological Studies

842
Confounding in statistical epidemiology represents a pivotal challenge, referring to the distortion in the perceived relationship between an exposure and an outcome due to the presence of a third variable, known as a confounder. This variable is associated with both the exposure and the outcome but is not a direct link in their causal chain. Its presence can lead to erroneous interpretations of the exposure's effect, either exaggerating or underestimating the true association. This...
842
Bias in Epidemiological Studies01:29

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

1.4K
Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:  
1.4K
The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

32.0K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
32.0K
Introduction to Epidemiology01:26

Introduction to Epidemiology

1.9K
Epidemiology, known as the cornerstone of public health, involves studying the distribution and determinants of health-related events in defined populations and applying these insights to control health issues. This is essential for understanding how diseases spread, identifying populations at greater risk, and implementing measures to control or prevent outbreaks. Epidemiology addresses not only infectious diseases but also non-communicable conditions like cancer and cardiovascular disease,...
1.9K
Causality in Epidemiology01:21

Causality in Epidemiology

1.7K
Causality or causation is a fundamental concept in epidemiology, vital for understanding the relationships between various factors and health outcomes. Despite its importance, there's no single, universally accepted definition of causality within the discipline. Drawing from a systematic review, causality in epidemiology encompasses several definitions, including production, necessary and sufficient, sufficient-component, counterfactual, and probabilistic models. Each has its strengths and...
1.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Examining Differences in Recovery Outcomes between Male and Female Hip Fracture Patients: Design and Baseline Results of a Prospective Cohort Study from the Baltimore Hip Studies.

The Journal of frailty & aging·2018
Same author

Antibacterial action of oral aureomycin on the contents of the colon of man.

Antibiotics & chemotherapy (Northfield, Ill.)·2014
Same author

The association between body mass index, weight loss and physical function in the year following a hip fracture.

The journal of nutrition, health & aging·2013
Same author

Women with hip fracture experience greater loss of geometric strength in the contralateral hip during the year following fracture than age-matched controls.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2009
Same author

The Upper Midwest Health Study: a case-control study of primary intracranial gliomas in farm and rural residents.

Journal of agricultural safety and health·2006
Same author

Women with hip fracture have a greater rate of decline in bone mineral density than expected: another significant consequence of a common geriatric problem.

Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA·2006

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Feb 7, 2026

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
09:36

Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

Published on: February 2, 2017

27.9K

Some principles of epidemiologic studies.

R F Morton, J R Hebel

    The Journal of Family Practice
    |April 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Epidemiological evidence aids clinical decisions by assessing disease-factor links. Relative risk quantifies association strength, but bias and chance require careful consideration in study interpretation.

    More Related Videos

    Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
    10:11

    Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies

    Published on: October 22, 2014

    19.7K
    Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon
    10:29

    Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon

    Published on: January 6, 2011

    117.4K

    Related Experiment Videos

    Last Updated: Feb 7, 2026

    Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study
    09:36

    Assessment of Child Anthropometry in a Large Epidemiologic Study

    Published on: February 2, 2017

    27.9K
    Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies
    10:11

    Fundus Photography as a Convenient Tool to Study Microvascular Responses to Cardiovascular Disease Risk Factors in Epidemiological Studies

    Published on: October 22, 2014

    19.7K
    Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon
    10:29

    Principles of Rodent Surgery for the New Surgeon

    Published on: January 6, 2011

    117.4K

    Area of Science:

    • Epidemiology
    • Clinical Research
    • Biostatistics

    Background:

    • Epidemiological evidence is crucial for clinical decision-making.
    • Investigations typically assess the association between a suspected factor and disease occurrence.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explain the methods used in epidemiological investigations.
    • To highlight the importance of considering bias and chance in interpreting results.
    • To introduce relative risk as a key measure of association.

    Main Methods:

    • Retrospective studies compare exposure rates in cases versus controls.
    • Prospective studies compare disease incidence rates in exposed versus unexposed groups.
    • Acknowledges retrospective studies are feasible but prone to bias.

    Main Results:

    • Relative risk is a valuable index for quantifying the strength of an association.
    • Highlights the potential for bias in retrospective epidemiological studies.
    • Emphasizes the need to account for bias and chance in all study interpretations.

    Conclusions:

    • Epidemiological studies are vital for understanding disease-factor relationships.
    • Careful interpretation considering bias and chance is essential for valid clinical decisions.
    • Relative risk provides a standardized measure for assessing epidemiological associations.