Microelectrode Signals Provide Information Beyond Stereotactic Depth for Subthalamic Nucleus Classification: A Patient-Held-Out Study
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Nov 10, 2026

Microelectrode Guided Implantation of Electrodes into the Subthalamic Nucleus of Rats for Long-term Deep Brain Stimulation
Published on: October 2, 2015
Shachar Zion Shemesh1, Zaki Hinnawi2, Tomer Maimon2
1Department of Neurosurgery, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel; Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Objectives:
During subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS), microelectrode recording (MER) helps identify the tissue encountered along the planned trajectory. We examined whether MER adds information beyond the electrode's depth relative to the planned target when classifying recordings from patients not used to develop the models.
Materials And Methods:
We analyzed 4650 recordings from 46 patients, assigned to separate development (28 patients), calibration (eight patients), and test (ten patients) groups. Three models used waveform features, target-relative depth, or both. All models and decision thresholds were fixed before testing. Discrimination was measured by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), averaged equally across patients; 1.0 indicates perfect discrimination and 0.5 indicates chance.
Results:
Among 1013 recordings from ten test patients, AUROC was 0.977 (95% CI 0.971-0.983) for signal + depth, 0.957 (95% CI 0.937-0.975) for signal alone, and 0.889 (95% CI 0.848-0.928) for depth alone. Combining signal and depth improved AUROC over depth alone by 0.088 (95% CI 0.051-0.127), with improvement in every patient. At the predefined threshold, sensitivity was 96.8% and specificity was 77.4%. In an exploratory analysis within ±2 mm of the target, AUROC for signal alone remained 0.963, compared with 0.595 for depth alone.
Conclusions:
MER provided information beyond target-relative depth for classifying source-labeled STN recordings in previously unseen patients. Combining both inputs gave the highest discrimination. These results support further evaluation of quantitative MER as an adjunct to surgical targeting; they do not establish optimal lead placement or improved clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
10:46Acute In Vivo Electrophysiological Recordings of Local Field Potentials and Multi-unit Activity from the Hyperdirect Pathway in Anesthetized Rats
Published on: June 22, 2017
09:00Investigating The Network-Wide Mechanisms of Pallidal Deep Brain Stimulation Using High-Density Microelectrode Arrays
Published on: June 16, 2026