Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Urodynamic testing: alternatives to electronics.

F Hinman

    The Journal of Urology
    |May 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Clinical urodynamic testing offers a cost-effective alternative to electronic urodynamic testing for evaluating bladder conditions. Office-based clinical methods may provide more practical insights for patient treatment than expensive electronic assessments.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Review of urologic surgery.

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1920)·2010
    Same author

    Review of urologic surgery.

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1920)·2010
    Same author

    Hydronephrosis; the surgical treatment.

    Surgery·2010
    Same author

    Review of urologic surgery.

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1920)·2010
    Same author

    Review of urologic surgery.

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1920)·2010
    Same author

    Review of urologic surgery.

    Archives of surgery (Chicago, Ill. : 1920)·2010
    Same journal

    On the Memoryless Property in Markov Models for NMIBC Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    Multi-institutional Assessment of Performance Metrics for MRI-targeted Transperineal Prostate Biopsy.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    Urinary Supersaturation in a Randomized Trial among Individuals with Recurrent Nephrolithiasis comparing Empiric versus Selective Preventive Therapy: The URINE Trial.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    The FDA Should Allow More BCG Strains into the US Market: How Recent Landmark Trials Expose a Regulatory Paradox.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    Let's Shift the Focus from Death to Life after Fournier's Gangrene.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    Same journal

    Endourology and Nephrolithiasis.

    The Journal of urology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Urology
    • Medical Diagnostics

    Background:

    • Electronic urodynamic testing (EUT) is resource-intensive, requiring significant equipment, operator expertise, and time.
    • Clinical urodynamic testing (CUT) encompasses readily available office-based assessments.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the utility of clinical urodynamic testing versus electronic urodynamic testing for common urologic syndromes.
    • To determine if less expensive, office-based methods can effectively guide treatment.

    Main Methods:

    • Review and analysis of common syndromes necessitating urodynamic evaluation.
    • Comparison of diagnostic information obtained from EUT (e.g., bladder pressure, urethral pressure profile, electromyography) and CUT (e.g., voiding habits, bladder capacity, residual urine volume, cystography, cystometrography).

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • Clinical urodynamic testing includes assessments like voiding habits, bladder capacity, and residual urine volume.
    • Electronic urodynamic testing involves bladder pressure, urethral pressure profile, and electromyography.
    • Analysis suggests clinical urodynamic testing may be more beneficial for guiding appropriate treatment decisions.

    Conclusions:

    • Clinical urodynamic testing provides valuable diagnostic information for common urologic conditions.
    • Office-based clinical urodynamic testing may be a more practical and useful approach than expensive electronic methods for treatment selection.