Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The right not to read.

R D Snyder

    Pediatrics
    |May 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Reading skill is relative, not absolute, and schools may overemphasize its importance. Individual differences in reading ability persist due to biological and societal factors, not solely educational interventions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Corrigendum to "Bacterial mutagenicity screening in the pharmaceutical industry" [Mutat. Res. 752(2) (2013) 99-118].

    Mutation research·2020
    Same author

    Bacterial mutagenicity screening in the pharmaceutical industry.

    Mutation research·2012
    Same author

    An assessment of the carcinogenic potential of ezetimibe using nonclinical data in a weight-of-evidence approach.

    Toxicology·2009
    Same author

    Predictive models for carcinogenicity and mutagenicity: frameworks, state-of-the-art, and perspectives.

    Journal of environmental science and health. Part C, Environmental carcinogenesis & ecotoxicology reviews·2009
    Same author

    Information from the Internet: attitudes of Australian oncology patients.

    Internal medicine journal·2006
    Same author

    American Academy of Neurology qualifications and guidelines for the physician expert witness.

    Neurology·2006
    Same journal

    From Screening to Support: Crafting Social Needs Response Systems That Work for Families.

    Pediatrics·2026
    Same journal

    A Social Care Intervention in Pediatric Practices: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Trial.

    Pediatrics·2026
    Same journal

    Pediatric Cheerleading-Related Head Injuries and the "Double Down" Rule Change.

    Pediatrics·2026
    Same journal

    Tobacco Use Among Middle and High School Students: 2025 National Youth Tobacco Survey.

    Pediatrics·2026
    Same journal

    Nirmatrelvir/Ritonavir for the Treatment of COVID-19 in Children Aged 6 Years and Older.

    Pediatrics·2026
    Same journal

    Correction to "Standardized Criteria for Genomic Testing in the NICU".

    Pediatrics·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Psychology
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Linguistics

    Background:

    • Reading proficiency is a key educational goal, yet individual differences in skill acquisition are significant.
    • The role of formal schooling versus inherent factors in determining reading ability remains a subject of debate.
    • Current remediation strategies for reading difficulties are often questioned for their effectiveness and impact on children.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the overemphasis on reading skills in educational settings.
    • To explore the primary determinants of reading ability, including biological and societal influences.
    • To assess the efficacy of current reading remediation methods and propose alternative perspectives.

    Main Methods:

    • Review of existing literature on reading development and educational interventions.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Analysis of the concept of relative versus absolute reading skill determination.
  • Examination of the impact of biological factors and societal pressures on reading acquisition.

    • Main Results:

    • Reading skill is determined relatively, meaning persistent individual differences in ability are expected.
    • Biological makeup and societal pressures are identified as more significant factors than schooling in shaping reading skills.
    • Many children with dyslexia improve naturally over time, suggesting developmental processes are key.
    • Current remediation techniques may be ineffective or even detrimental for some children.

    Conclusions:

    • Schools should acknowledge the limitations in eradicating individual differences in reading ability.
    • The efficacy of intensive reading remediation programs is questionable, with natural development playing a crucial role.
    • Children struggling with reading should be encouraged but not forced, respecting their individual pace and potential aversion to the task.