Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

DSM-III field trials: I. Initial interrater diagnostic reliability.

R L Spitzer, J B Forman, J Nee

    The American Journal of Psychiatry
    |June 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary

    The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) significantly improved diagnostic agreement among clinicians compared to earlier versions. This enhanced reliability is attributed to specific changes in the classification system and diagnostic criteria.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Higher versus lower mean arterial blood pressure after cardiac arrest and resuscitation (MAP-CARE): A protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2025
    Same author

    Fever management with or without a temperature control device after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and resuscitation (TEMP-CARE): A study protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2025
    Same author

    Sedation, temperature and pressure after cardiac arrest and resuscitation-The STEPCARE trial: A statistical analysis plan.

    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2025
    Same author

    Continuous deep sedation versus minimal sedation after cardiac arrest and resuscitation (SED-CARE): A protocol for a randomized clinical trial.

    Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica·2025
    Same author

    [Open questions with respect to extracorporeal circulatory support 2024].

    Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin·2024
    Same author

    Reduction in pain: Is it worth the gain? The effect of opioids on the GI tract.

    Neurogastroenterology and motility·2018

    Area of Science:

    • Psychiatry
    • Psychological and Cognitive Sciences
    • Clinical Psychology

    Background:

    • Previous versions of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM-I and DSM-II) demonstrated poor to fair interrater agreement for diagnostic categories.
    • This lack of reliability posed challenges for consistent clinical diagnosis and research.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the interrater reliability of the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Third Edition (DSM-III) during its initial field trials.
    • To compare the reliability of DSM-III diagnoses with that of earlier versions.

    Main Methods:

    • The study involved phase one of the DSM-III field trials, assessing 281 adult patients.
    • Interrater agreement was measured using kappa coefficients for both joint interviews and separate interviews for Axis I and Axis II diagnoses.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Main Results:

    • The overall kappa coefficient for Axis I diagnoses was .78 for joint interviews and .66 for separate interviews.
    • For Axis II diagnoses (personality and developmental disorders), agreement coefficients were .61 (joint) and .54 (separate).
    • These results indicate a substantial improvement in diagnostic agreement compared to DSM-I and DSM-II.

    Conclusions:

    • The DSM-III demonstrates significantly higher interrater reliability than its predecessors.
    • Improvements in diagnostic criteria, separation of diagnostic axes, and systematic disorder descriptions likely contribute to enhanced reliability.