Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Mixed venous and arterial Pco2.

J D McEvoy, N L Jones, E J Campbell

    British Medical Journal
    |December 21, 1974
    PubMed
    Summary

    The rebreathing method estimates arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) from mixed venous PCO2 (PvCO2). A common 6 mm Hg subtraction overestimates PaCO2; Paco(2) = 0.8 Pvco(2) is a better estimate in normal conditions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Dirofilariasis mouse models for heartworm preclinical research.

    Frontiers in microbiology·2023
    Same author

    A Case of Renal Asthma.

    Postgraduate medical journal·2011
    Same author

    On the probability of a committee meeting.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    Pharmacokinetic differences in exposure to camphor after intraruminal dosing in selectively bred lines of goats.

    Journal of animal science·2010
    Same author

    Development of predictive models for airflow obstruction in alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency.

    American journal of epidemiology·2009
    Same author

    Phosphorylated c-Src in the nucleus is associated with improved patient outcome in ER-positive breast cancer.

    British journal of cancer·2008

    Area of Science:

    • Cardiorespiratory physiology
    • Pulmonary medicine
    • Critical care medicine

    Background:

    • The rebreathing method offers a non-invasive estimation of arterial PCO2 (PaCO2) using mixed venous PCO2 (PvCO2).
    • Current practice often subtracts a fixed 6 mm Hg from PvCO2 to approximate PaCO2.
    • This fixed subtraction can lead to significant overestimation of PaCO2 in various clinical scenarios.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the accuracy of the common practice of subtracting 6 mm Hg from PvCO2 to estimate PaCO2.
    • To establish a more accurate estimation formula for PaCO2 based on PvCO2 measurements.
    • To analyze the factors influencing the PvCO2-PaCO2 difference in patients.

    Main Methods:

    • Measurements of PvCO2 and PaCO2 were conducted in 19 patients.
    • The study analyzed the relationship between PvCO2 and PaCO2 under varying physiological conditions.
    • Factors affecting the venoarterial PCO2 difference were reviewed and quantified.

    Main Results:

    • A simplified formula, Paco(2) = 0.8 Pvco(2), provides a better approximation of PaCO2 under normal cardiac output and arterial oxygen saturation.
    • The PvCO2-PaCO2 difference can be substantially wider than previously assumed.
    • Arterial unsaturation and low cardiac output significantly increase the PvCO2-PaCO2 difference.

    Conclusions:

    • The standard practice of subtracting 6 mm Hg from PvCO2 to estimate PaCO2 is often inaccurate.
    • The formula Paco(2) = 0.8 Pvco(2) offers improved accuracy for PaCO2 estimation in stable patients.
    • Understanding the determinants of the PvCO2-PaCO2 gradient is crucial for comprehensive patient assessment in cardiorespiratory disease.

    Related Experiment Videos