Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Manipulative and inherent errors in anti-D quantitation using the AutoAnalyzer.

H H Gunson, P K Phillips, F Stratton

    Journal of Clinical Pathology
    |March 1, 1972
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Rhesus type Du.

    Annals of eugenics·2014
    Same author

    A new Rh allelomorph.

    Nature·2010
    Same author

    Rh blocking antibodies.

    Nature·2010
    Same author

    Haemolytic Disease in One Dizygotic Twin.

    British medical journal·2010
    Same author

    Blood Transfusions in 1875.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
    Same author

    Comparison of surface temperature in 13-lined ground squirrel (Spermophilus tridecimlineatus) and yellow-bellied marmot (Marmota flaviventris) during arousal from hibernation.

    Comparative biochemistry and physiology. Part A, Molecular & integrative physiology·2004

    Quantitating anti-D using the AutoAnalyzer is now more accurate, with confidence limits reduced from +/- 26% to +/- 14%. This improvement in anti-D antibody quantitation enhances diagnostic reliability.

    Area of Science:

    • Immunology
    • Clinical Chemistry

    Background:

    • Accurate quantitation of anti-D is crucial for managing RhD hemolytic disease of the newborn.
    • Traditional manual dilution methods for anti-D quantitation present significant accuracy limitations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To improve the accuracy and reproducibility of anti-D quantitation using the AutoAnalyzer.
    • To identify and mitigate sources of error in the automated assay.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized an automatic pipette for sample dilutions to replace manual preparation.
    • Investigated the impact of test cell age, variations in test cells, machine sensitivity drift, and standard graph position on reproducibility.

    Main Results:

    • Reduced the 95% confidence limits for anti-D quantitation from +/- 26% to +/- 14%.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Estimated the inherent AutoAnalyzer error to contribute +/- 10% to the overall error.
  • Identified key factors affecting reproducibility, including test cell characteristics and machine performance over time.

    • Conclusions:

    • Automated pipetting significantly enhances the accuracy of anti-D quantitation.
    • Understanding and controlling variables affecting reproducibility is essential for reliable anti-D testing.