Related Experiment Videos
Septicemia in patients with an endocardial pacemaker.
The American Journal of Cardiology
|August 1, 1979
Summary
Septicemia from long-term endocardial pacing occurred in 1% of patients. Prompt removal of the pacing system and epicardial system insertion led to survival, unlike leaving the endocardial system in place.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Long-term pacing is a crucial treatment for cardiac conditions.
- Endocardial pacing systems carry a risk of infection, including septicemia.
- Understanding septicemia incidence and outcomes in pacing patients is vital.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine the incidence, mechanism, course, and treatment of septicemia in patients with long-term endocardial pacing.
- To evaluate the effectiveness of different treatment strategies for septicemia in this patient group.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 1,235 patients treated with endocardial pacing between 1964 and 1977.
- Identification of patients who developed septicemia and analysis of causative organisms.
- Comparison of treatment outcomes based on whether the endocardial pacing system was retained or removed.
Main Results:
- Septicemia developed in 12 patients (1%), with Staphylococcus aureus being the most common pathogen (10 cases).
- Treatment success was significantly higher when the endocardial pacing system was promptly removed and an epicardial system inserted (4/4 survivors).
- Retaining the endocardial system resulted in lower success rates (2/7), with recurrence in 3 patients and mortality in 2.
Conclusions:
- Septicemia is a rare but serious complication of endocardial pacing.
- Prompt removal of the infected endocardial pacing system, potentially with thoracotomy and epicardial system insertion, is the preferred treatment strategy.
- This approach significantly improves survival rates compared to retaining the infected system.