Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Method for evaluating drug information systems.

L J Laning, M S Leonard, P M Mullins

    American Journal of Hospital Pharmacy
    |June 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Structure--activity relationships of side-chain modified didemnins.

    Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry letters·2001
    Same author

    The anatomy of the intraosseous injection.

    Dentistry today·2001
    Same author

    Congeneric behavior in estimations of octanol-water partition coefficients by micellar electrokinetic chromatography.

    Analytical chemistry·2000
    Same author

    The maxillary frenum and surgical treatment.

    General dentistry·1999
    Same author

    Whiplash and temporomandibular disorders: a critical review.

    Journal of the American Dental Association (1939)·1998
    Same author

    A reasonable approach to patient consent for publication.

    Journal of oral and maxillofacial surgery : official journal of the American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons·1998
    Same journal

    National health care reform, Part 2: Response to pharmacists.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Validity of originality assessment.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Unit dose dispensing of chromic phosphate P 32 suspension.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Hydralazine injection still available.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Improved extemporaneous formulation of cyclosporine ophthalmic drops.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    Same journal

    Paclitaxel diluent and the case of the slippery spike.

    American journal of hospital pharmacy·1994
    See all related articles

    This study presents a method to evaluate drug information systems by assessing content quality and operational costs. The approach ensures comprehensive data coverage and identifies system performance metrics for better drug information management.

    Area of Science:

    • Pharmacology
    • Health Informatics
    • Information Science

    Background:

    • Drug information systems are crucial for safe and effective medication use.
    • Evaluating the performance of these systems is essential for quality assurance.
    • Existing evaluation methods may lack comprehensive qualitative and quantitative measures.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce a novel method for evaluating drug information systems.
    • To assess both qualitative and quantitative performance aspects of these systems.
    • To provide a framework for comparing different drug information system performances.

    Main Methods:

    • Developed a method measuring qualitative and quantitative system performance.
    • Identified essential data points for 'Basic Therapeutic Information' and 'Commercial and Investigational Product Information'.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Searched systems for data on 122 drugs, clinical/nonclinical research information, drug-drug interactions (215), and drug-laboratory test interferences (244).
  • Calculated aggregate content measure using assigned content statistics weights.
  • Included annual operating cost as a performance metric.
  • Main Results:

    • The described method allows for a comprehensive evaluation of drug information systems.
    • Quantitative and qualitative performance metrics were established.
    • The study briefly discusses the application of the method to two drug information systems, highlighting its practical utility.

    Conclusions:

    • The proposed evaluation method offers a robust approach to assessing drug information systems.
    • This method can aid in selecting and optimizing drug information systems for healthcare settings.
    • Standardized evaluation contributes to improved drug safety and information accessibility.