Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Should scientists communicate--and if so, with whom?

R D Tschirgi

    Bulletin of the Medical Library Association
    |January 1, 1973
    PubMed
    Summary

    Academic scientists face pressure to publish frequently, leading to an overabundance of trivial research. This focus on publication quantity over quality hinders the development of truly novel scientific concepts.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Further analysis of the gasp reflex.

    Federation proceedings·2010
    Same author

    The carotid-mandibular reflex in acute respiratory failure.

    The American journal of physiology·2010
    Same author

    Carotid receptors essential in the gasping of the isolated rat head.

    Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine. Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine (New York, N.Y.)·2010
    Same author

    On the phylogeny of asymmetry and spatial discrimination.

    Journal of theoretical biology·1984
    Same author

    Automata simulation of the selection process.

    Bio Systems·1984
    Same author

    The location of new medical schools. National design or local initiative?

    JAMA·1971

    Area of Science:

    • Scientific research and publication
    • Academic career progression
    • Intellectual property in science

    Background:

    • Current academic success metrics heavily emphasize publication rates in scholarly journals.
    • This valuation system incentivizes quantity over quality, leading to a rise in redundant and trivial scientific publications.
    • The ease of generating publishable observations in well-equipped labs, irrespective of relevance, exacerbates this issue.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the prevailing criterion for professional success among academic scientists.
    • To investigate the impact of publication-centric metrics on the quality and originality of scientific output.
    • To highlight the potential negative consequences of prioritizing publication quantity over conceptual innovation.

    Main Methods:

    • Qualitative analysis of the current academic publishing landscape.
    • Conceptual critique of the relationship between publication metrics and scientific progress.
    • Exploration of the factors contributing to the overproduction of scientific data.

    Main Results:

    • The primary measure of success in academia is publication rate, often divorced from genuine scientific contribution.
    • This has resulted in a significant increase in publications that are dilute, redundant, and lack substantial impact.
    • The creative process of formulating novel scientific concepts is obscured by the ease of generating publishable, yet trivial, observations.

    Conclusions:

    • The current emphasis on publication quantity distorts the scientific enterprise and devalues conceptual innovation.
    • A shift in focus from 'talking less and thinking more' is needed to foster genuine scientific advancement.
    • Re-evaluating academic success metrics is crucial to encourage deeper scientific thinking and concept development.

    Related Experiment Videos