Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Does continuing medical education by peer review really work?

J E Devitt

    Canadian Medical Association Journal
    |May 19, 1973
    PubMed
    Summary

    Peer review of breast surgery statistics showed a significant increase in cancer-positive biopsies, indicating fewer unnecessary procedures. However, the impact on reducing postoperative hospital stays was less clear, questioning the overall effectiveness of this educational approach.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Screening for breast cancer: current status, problems, prospects.

    Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien·2011
    Same author

    Office diagnosis of breast cancer.

    Canadian Medical Association journal·2010
    Same author

    Breast cancer: have we missed the forest because of the tree?

    Lancet (London, England)·1994
    Same author

    Risk of breast cancer in women with breast cysts.

    CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne·1992
    Same author

    False alarms of breast cancer.

    Lancet (London, England)·1989
    Same author

    Benign breast disease in the postmenopausal woman.

    World journal of surgery·1989

    Area of Science:

    • Surgical Outcomes
    • Medical Education
    • Quality Improvement

    Background:

    • Breast operation statistics require review to ensure optimal patient care.
    • Establishing performance standards is crucial for surgical quality assessment.
    • Surgeon performance data can be used for comparative analysis.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the impact of peer review on breast operation statistics.
    • To assess changes in the proportion of positive cancer biopsies and postoperative stay length.
    • To determine the effectiveness of continuing medical education through peer review.

    Main Methods:

    • A peer review process was implemented for breast operation statistics.
    • Standards were developed for biopsy positivity and postoperative stay duration.
    • Surgeons received feedback on their performance relative to peers.
    • Data was collected and analyzed one year after the initial review.

    Main Results:

    • A statistically significant improvement was observed in the proportion of biopsies positive for cancer.
    • The reduction in unnecessary biopsies was a key outcome.
    • The pre-existing trend of reducing postoperative stays was not accelerated.
    • Variability in surgeon performance and low case volume complicated the assessment.

    Conclusions:

    • Peer review can lead to improvements in specific surgical quality metrics, such as reducing unnecessary biopsies.
    • The effectiveness of peer review in accelerating improvements in other areas, like postoperative stay, may be limited.
    • Further investigation is needed to fully understand the impact and optimize continuing medical education strategies in surgery.

    Related Experiment Videos