Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Budget and the National Cancer Program.

Science (New York, N.Y.)

|May 24, 1974

Summary

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) budget requires careful balancing of various research priorities and funding streams. Continuous evaluation and input are crucial for adapting to scientific advancements and budgetary constraints in cancer research.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The LIM protein Ajuba promotes adipogenesis by enhancing PPARγ and p300/CBP interaction.

Cell death and differentiation·2015

Same author

Targeting histone deacetylase complexes via KRAB-zinc finger proteins: the PHD and bromodomains of KAP-1 form a cooperative unit that recruits a novel isoform of the Mi-2alpha subunit of NuRD.

Genes & development·2001

Same author

Ets regulation of the erbB2 promoter.

Oncogene·2001

Same author

Regulating the neoplastic phenotype using engineered transcriptional repressors.

Cancer letters·2001

Same author

Hormone-dependent tumor regression in vivo by an inducible transcriptional repressor directed at the PAX3-FKHR oncogene.

Cancer research·2000

Same author

Molecular determinants for targeting heterochromatin protein 1-mediated gene silencing: direct chromoshadow domain-KAP-1 corepressor interaction is essential.

Molecular and cellular biology·2000

Area of Science:

Health Policy and Management
Cancer Research Funding
Biomedical Research Administration

Background:

The National Cancer Institute (NCI) budget allocation involves complex considerations beyond scientific merit.
Balancing diverse research areas, funding mechanisms, and timeframes is a significant challenge.
The federal budgetary process and scientific priority-setting influence the pace of new research directions.

Purpose of the Study:

To present the NCI budget for informational purposes and solicit feedback for improvement.
To highlight the complexities and considerations involved in NCI's financial planning.
To foster a collaborative approach to optimizing cancer research resource allocation.

Main Methods:

Presentation of the current NCI budget status.
Discussion of key factors influencing budget allocation and program balance.
Solicitation of comments and advice from stakeholders.

Main Results:

The NCI budget is subject to continuous review and adjustment based on scientific findings and other factors.
Limited federal resources necessitate strategic prioritization within cancer research and other biomedical fields.
Operating funds for other NIH institutes are projected to increase, indicating broader biomedical research support.

Conclusions:

Effective cancer research funding requires a dynamic and balanced approach, acknowledging scientific and non-scientific influences.
Continuous dialogue and input are essential for refining NCI's strategic financial planning.
Interdisciplinary collaboration and resource sharing across biomedical research areas are vital.

Related Experiment Videos