Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

A mammography quality assurance test program.

A Burgess

    Radiology
    |November 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Remote quality assurance testing for mammography equipment was evaluated. Most equipment showed stable performance, but phantoms primarily identified poor image quality without diagnosing specific causes.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Preventative strategies for low anterior resection syndrome.

    Techniques in coloproctology·2023
    Same author

    PROSPECT guideline for tonsillectomy: systematic review and procedure-specific postoperative pain management recommendations.

    Anaesthesia·2020
    Same author

    Anesthetic management for cesarean delivery for a parturient with metaphyseal dysplasia and hypophosphatemic rickets.

    International journal of obstetric anesthesia·2020
    Same author

    A rare presentation of a paediatric patient with acute otomastoiditis media caused by mycobacterium tuberculosis resulting in intracranial complications.

    Journal of surgical case reports·2019
    Same author

    Upper airway obstruction assessment: Peak inspiratory flow and clinical COPD Questionnaire.

    Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery·2018
    Same author

    The role of canonical and non-canonical Hedgehog signaling in tumor progression in a mouse model of small cell lung cancer.

    Oncogene·2017
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Prediction of Lobar Emphysema Progression with a CT-Based Foundational Model.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Associations of MRI-derived Paraspinal IMAT and LMM with Cardiometabolic Risk Factors: Results from a German Cohort.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Erratum for: Blue Rubber Bleb Nevus Syndrome.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    Redefining the Clinical Role of MRI in Endometrial Cancer Staging.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    To Ablate or Not to Ablate: The Colorectal Liver Metastasis Question.

    Radiology·2026
    Same journal

    The Limits of Radiologic Categorization in Pulmonary Nonsolid Nodules.

    Radiology·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Radiology
    • Medical Imaging
    • Quality Assurance

    Background:

    • Film mammography requires rigorous quality assurance for accurate diagnoses.
    • Remote testing methods can improve accessibility and efficiency in quality control.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To design and implement a remote quality assurance program for film mammography.
    • To assess the stability of mammography equipment and the effectiveness of remote testing.

    Main Methods:

    • Monthly distribution of mammography phantoms and sensitometric strips to 24 hospitals.
    • Measurement of tube output, equipment stability, and film quality via remote analysis.
    • Utilized nonscreen films for reliable measurement of x-ray machine beams.

    Main Results:

    Related Experiment Videos

    • Most hospital processors and x-ray machines demonstrated stable performance over 12 months.
    • Nonscreen films proved effective for measuring x-ray machine useful beams.
    • Mammography phantoms were useful in identifying poor image quality instances.

    Conclusions:

    • Remote quality assurance testing is feasible for film mammography.
    • While phantoms detect image quality issues, they do not pinpoint specific equipment faults.
    • Routine monitoring of mammography equipment stability is crucial for diagnostic accuracy.