Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Current confidence in occupational health.

H F Smyth

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
    |August 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Current workplace health hazard concerns lack strong evidence. Misleading communications, often based on flawed animal models and speculation, erode public confidence in hazard management. Greater scientific rigor is needed.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Solving the problem of the toxicity of new chemicals in industry.

    The West Virginia medical journal·2010
    Same author

    Anthrax; its diagnosis and treatment.

    Occupational medicine·2010
    Same author

    The toxicity of high molecular weight polyethylene glycols; chronic oral and parenteral administration.

    Journal of the American Pharmaceutical Association. American Pharmaceutical Association·2010
    Same author

    Chemical burns of the rabbit cornea.

    American journal of ophthalmology·2010
    Same author

    A new medium for the Cultivation of Chick Tissues in Vitro, with some Additions to the Technic.

    The Journal of medical research·2009
    Same author

    THE REACTIONS BETWEEN BACTERIA AND ANIMAL TISSUES UNDER CONDITIONS OF ARTIFICIAL CULTIVATION.

    The Journal of experimental medicine·2009

    Area of Science:

    • Occupational Health
    • Risk Assessment
    • Toxicology

    Background:

    • Public apprehension regarding workplace health hazards is widespread.
    • Concerns often stem from communications by regulatory bodies and experts.
    • Confidence in hazard assessment is frequently undermined.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To critically evaluate the justification for current workplace health hazard concerns.
    • To identify reasons for the erosion of public confidence in hazard communication.
    • To advocate for more scientifically rigorous and responsible risk assessment.

    Main Methods:

    • Analysis of common communication strategies regarding workplace hazards.
    • Critique of methodologies used in animal model studies for human risk assessment.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Evaluation of the distinction between theoretical possibilities and realistic probabilities in risk communication.

    • Main Results:

    • Found minimal empirical justification for widespread health hazard fears in workplaces.
    • Identified several factors contributing to diminished public trust.
    • Highlighted issues such as misinterpreting correlation as causation and the misuse of animal models.

    Conclusions:

    • Current workplace health hazard anxieties are largely unsubstantiated.
    • Flawed scientific communication, including reliance on inappropriate models and speculation, damages credibility.
    • A call for evidence-based, realistic, and confirmed findings in occupational health risk assessment is necessary.