Related Experiment Videos
Communication and language in severely deaf adolescents
British Journal of Psychology (London, England : 1953)
|November 1, 1979
Summary
Manual signing systems significantly improve language and cognitive skills in deaf individuals compared to oral methods. Total communication approaches are more effective for developing linguistic competence and overall communication abilities.
Area of Science:
- Psychology
- Linguistics
- Deaf Education
Background:
- Early severe or profound deafness impairs natural language processing and communication skills.
- Prelingual deafness hinders the development of sequential/syntactical skills crucial for linguistic competence.
- Traditional UK educational approaches for the deaf rely on amplification and lip-reading, with limited success.
Purpose of the Study:
- To experimentally compare the communicative effectiveness of oral and total communication systems.
- To investigate how language structure influences communication system efficacy.
- To provide evidence supporting more effective communication strategies for deaf individuals.
Main Methods:
- An experimental study was conducted to assess communication systems.
- Both oral and total communication methods were evaluated.
- The study analyzed communication effectiveness across various language structures.
Main Results:
- Total communication systems demonstrated greater effectiveness than oral methods for most language structures.
- Manual signing, a component of total communication, proved more productive for linguistic and cognitive skills.
- The findings indicate a clear advantage for total communication in facilitating communication.
Conclusions:
- Total communication systems are superior to oral methods for enhancing linguistic and cognitive skills in deaf individuals.
- Manual signing is a key factor in the effectiveness of total communication.
- Educational strategies for the deaf should prioritize total communication approaches for improved outcomes.