Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Response behavior around auditory threshold.

R T Fulton, S S Hume

    Journal of the American Auditory Society
    |July 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Auditory threshold testing reveals that learning curves in children, including those with hearing impairments or intellectual disabilities, depend more on mental age than hearing sensitivity. Performance variability is linked to cognitive development, not hearing loss.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The use of microcomputer technology in assessing and training communication skills of young hearing-impaired children.

    American annals of the deaf·1983
    Same author

    Effect of a contralateral masking stimulus on auditory response performance.

    The Journal of auditory research·1983
    Same author

    Lack of effect of contralateral speech discourse on auditory threshold response behavior.

    The Journal of auditory research·1982
    Same author

    Intra- and intermodal discrimination transfer in auditory and visual discrimination training.

    Ear and hearing·1980
    Same author

    Conditioning the middle ear reflex at sensation levels below reflex threshold: air jet and electrical stimulation.

    Ear and hearing·1980
    Same author

    On stringent procedures and scientific methodology in the audiometric clinic.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    A comparison of the effect on consonant discrimination of combining low- and high-frequency passbands in normal, congenital, and adventitious hearing-impaired subjects.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    Influence of high pass filtering on the intelligibility of amplitude-compressed speech.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    Brainstem electrical responses from selected tone pip stimuli.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    A discussion of some temporal characteristics of electroacoustic impedance bridges.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    Acoustic reflex thresholds using conventional and tracking methods.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    An atlas of microscopic dissection following the attic approach to the cat's middle ear.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Developmental Psychology
    • Neuroscience

    Background:

    • Auditory threshold assessment is crucial for understanding hearing function.
    • Developmental factors can influence auditory perception and learning.
    • Previous research has not fully elucidated the interplay between cognitive development and auditory learning in different populations.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare auditory threshold learning curves in normal adults, hearing-impaired children, and children with intellectual disabilities.
    • To investigate whether hearing sensitivity or cognitive factors (mental age) primarily influence auditory learning and performance variability.
    • To explore the relationship between signal experience and auditory performance.

    Main Methods:

    • Repeated measures of auditory thresholds at 250 Hz and 1000 Hz were conducted.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Performance data were analyzed by plotting percentage of correct responses relative to interpolated thresholds.
  • Group comparisons were made between adults, hearing-impaired children, and children with intellectual disabilities.

    • Main Results:

    • The steepness of performance curves and response variability were significantly related to differences between adult and child groups (mental age).
    • No significant differences in performance curves or variability were found based on hearing sensitivity.
    • Cognitive development, specifically mental age, was a stronger predictor of auditory learning than hearing status.

    Conclusions:

    • Auditory learning and performance variability are primarily influenced by cognitive development (mental age) rather than hearing sensitivity.
    • These findings suggest that educational and diagnostic approaches for auditory assessment in children should consider cognitive factors.
    • Further research is warranted to explore the role of signal experience in auditory learning across different developmental and hearing statuses.