Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Auditory-visual interaction in a dichotic listening task.

M R Navarro

    Journal of the American Auditory Society
    |July 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study on consonant-vowel syllable (CV) identification found that visual stimuli can influence auditory perception. While the right ear showed a slight advantage, visual input improved left ear performance when non-competing, but hindered it when competing.

    Related Experiment Videos

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Plasma Rich in Growth Factors as an Adjuvant Treatment for the Management of Frontal Fibrosing Alopecia: A Retrospective Observational Clinical Study.

    Journal of cutaneous medicine and surgery·2023
    Same author

    [The experimental infection of Cebus apella sp. monkeys with Trypanosoma cruzi. Its clinical, electrocardiographic and anatomicopathological assessment].

    Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical·1992
    Same author

    Thermographic study of laser on arteries.

    Lasers in surgery and medicine·1987
    Same author

    [Arterial anastomoses with the argon laser. Experimental study].

    Arquivos brasileiros de cardiologia·1986
    Same author

    A comparison of custom in-the-ear hearing aids.

    Ear and hearing·1980
    Same author

    An earmold for the geriatric patient.

    The Journal of speech and hearing disorders·1977
    Same journal

    A comparison of the effect on consonant discrimination of combining low- and high-frequency passbands in normal, congenital, and adventitious hearing-impaired subjects.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    Influence of high pass filtering on the intelligibility of amplitude-compressed speech.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    Brainstem electrical responses from selected tone pip stimuli.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    A discussion of some temporal characteristics of electroacoustic impedance bridges.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    Acoustic reflex thresholds using conventional and tracking methods.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    Same journal

    An atlas of microscopic dissection following the attic approach to the cat's middle ear.

    Journal of the American Auditory Society·1979
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Auditory Perception
    • Speech Processing
    • Multisensory Integration

    Background:

    • Understanding how auditory and visual information interact is crucial for speech perception.
    • Previous research suggests visual cues can enhance auditory processing, but competition effects are less understood.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To investigate the impact of visual stimuli on the identification of dichotic consonant-vowel syllables (CVs).
    • To examine how competing versus non-competing visual information affects auditory performance in each ear.

    Main Methods:

    • Eleven adults identified dichotic CVs under three conditions: auditory only, auditory-visual with consistent visual cues, and auditory-visual with varying visual cues.
    • Performance was analyzed for each ear and across conditions, including error types.

    Main Results:

    • No significant ear differences were found, though a slight right-ear advantage existed in the auditory condition.
    • Visual stimuli reduced ear asymmetry. Left ear performance improved with non-competing visual cues but decreased with competing cues.
    • Overall auditory performance was poorer than visual performance. Errors were primarily place-of-articulation errors.

    Conclusions:

    • Visual stimuli modulate auditory speech perception, with effects depending on stimulus competition.
    • The left ear appears more susceptible to visual influences, showing enhancement or decrement based on visual cue relevance.
    • Multisensory integration plays a significant role in speech sound identification.