Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

M.L.Q.: a supplement to M.C.Q.

P R Fleming

    Lancet (London, England)
    |September 27, 1975
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This study introduces a novel candidate assessment method that tests factual recall and cognitive skills. The technique reliably distinguishes between high- and low-performing individuals, offering an alternative to traditional multiple-choice tests.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    The haemodynamic significance of intrapulmonary septal lymphatic lines (lines B of Kerley).

    The Journal of the Faculty of Radiologists. Faculty of Radiologists (Great Britain)·2014
    Same author

    The preregistration year: need for a national survey.

    Medical teacher·2014
    Same author

    A case of alveolar-cell tumour of the lung.

    The Middlesex Hospital journal·2010
    Same author

    John Desmond Gimlette: "one of God's own".

    Journal of medical biography·2001
    Same author

    Neuro-ophthalmological sequelae of horse-related accidents.

    Clinical & experimental ophthalmology·2001
    Same author

    Development of a novel class of monocyclic and bicyclic alkyl amides that exhibit CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptor affinity and receptor activation.

    Drug design and discovery·2000
    Same journal

    Convergence of metabolic risk in obesity and normal BMI: does risk disappear?

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    Metabolic traits in obesity and normal BMI in industrialised countries: a multi-country analysis of national population-based studies.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    Safety and efficacy of mRNA vaccines: a mechanistic and public health perspective.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    The US Ebola response and the future of global health leadership.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    Daniel Mason: a tale of change.

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    Same journal

    The 2026 Wakley-Wu Lien Teh Prize Essay: why medicine, and why stay?

    Lancet (London, England)·2026
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Educational Assessment
    • Cognitive Psychology
    • Psychometrics

    Background:

    • Traditional assessment methods like multiple-choice questions may not fully evaluate higher cognitive functions.
    • There is a need for more effective methods to assess candidates' ability to recall and manipulate factual information.
    • Evaluating candidates' cognitive attributes is crucial for accurate performance prediction.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To introduce and describe a novel method for testing candidates' ability to recall and manipulate factual information.
    • To propose an assessment technique that potentially measures higher cognitive attributes.
    • To evaluate the reliability of this new method in discriminating between candidates.

    Main Methods:

    • The described method involves candidates inserting a term that logically links two provided terms.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • This task is designed to assess factual recall and the manipulation of information.
  • The assessment focuses on evaluating higher cognitive functions beyond simple recognition.

    • Main Results:

    • The proposed method demonstrates reliable discrimination between good and poor candidates.
    • The assessment appears to effectively gauge candidates' ability to connect and utilize factual information.
    • Initial findings suggest this method surpasses multiple-choice questions in assessing cognitive depth.

    Conclusions:

    • The novel assessment method offers a reliable tool for evaluating candidates' cognitive abilities and factual knowledge.
    • This technique provides a promising alternative to conventional testing formats, potentially offering deeper insights into candidate potential.
    • Further research could explore the specific cognitive attributes measured and refine the application of this method.