Scanning electron microscopy of peripheral blood leukocytes of the chickens

Cell and Tissue Research
|January 1, 1979
PubMed

Insights

Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) revealed distinct surface morphologies for chicken leukocytes. However, SEM cannot reliably differentiate between B and T lymphocytes in chicken peripheral blood.

Area of Science:

  • Immunology
  • Cell Biology
  • Veterinary Science

Background:

  • Accurate identification of leukocyte subtypes is crucial in avian immunology.
  • Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) offers high-resolution surface imaging of cells.
  • Previous studies have explored SEM for leukocyte characterization in various species.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To characterize the surface morphology of chicken leukocytes using SEM.
  • To evaluate the utility of SEM in distinguishing between B and T lymphocytes in chickens.
  • To assess the impact of isolation methods on cell surface morphology.

Main Methods:

  • Leukocytes were isolated from chicken blood using Ficoll-based density gradient centrifugation.
  • Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (neutrophilic granulocytes) and mononuclear leukocytes were separated.
  • Cell surface morphology was examined using scanning electron microscopy (SEM).

Main Results:

  • Neutrophilic granulocytes exhibited ridge-like profiles and ruffles.
  • Lymphocytes displayed variable microvilli; B lymphocytes (via SRBC-rosette formation) showed similar morphology to other lymphocytes.
  • T lymphocytes with smooth surfaces were not definitively identified; monocytes showed ruffles but could resemble granulocytes.
  • Isolation media did not significantly alter cell surface morphology compared to the buffy-coat method.

Conclusions:

  • SEM reveals distinct surface features of chicken granulocytes and monocytes.
  • SEM is not a reliable method for differentiating between chicken B and T lymphocytes.
  • The isolation techniques employed did not introduce significant artifacts in SEM-based surface morphology analysis.

Related Concept Videos