Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Some tuning fork tests revisited.

W Golabek, S D Stephens

    Clinical Otolaryngology and Allied Sciences
    |December 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    The Weber, Rinne, and Bing hearing tests were evaluated. The Weber test is most reliable on the upper incisors, while Rinne and Bing tests offer specific decibel thresholds for identifying hearing loss.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Investigations on viseme groups in Welsh.

    Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2010
    Same author

    Comparison of multidetector row CT cross-sectional source images with multiplanar 2D-, 3D- reconstructions and virtual endoscopy in assessment of the middle ear.

    Journal of neuroradiology = Journal de neuroradiologie·2006
    Same author

    [Complications of three methods of stapedectomy].

    Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology·2005
    Same author

    Short- and long-term results of stapedectomy in children.

    Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska. Sectio D: Medicina·2002
    Same author

    [Free forearm skin flap with microvascular anastomosis for oral cavity reconstruction].

    Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology·2002
    Same author

    [Melanoma of nasal cavity and paranasal sinus mucosa].

    Otolaryngologia polska = The Polish otolaryngology·2002
    Same journal

    Correspondence.

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2017
    Same journal

    Erratum.

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2013
    Same journal

    Compact training course in ear surgery erlangen, Germany, 26-28 february 1998.

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2013
    Same journal

    How we do it: a practical approach to Foley catheter posterior nasal packing.

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
    Same journal

    How we do it: management of tracheobronchial foreign bodies in children.

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
    Same journal

    Is cochlear outer hair cell function affected by mobile telephone radiation?

    Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences·2004
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Otolaryngology
    • Diagnostic Medicine

    Background:

    • Hearing tests like Weber, Rinne, and Bing are crucial for diagnosing hearing impairments.
    • Optimizing the techniques for these tests can improve diagnostic accuracy.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To evaluate the sensitivity and reliability of the Weber, Rinne, and Bing tests.
    • To determine optimal techniques for performing these audiological assessments.

    Main Methods:

    • Examined Weber, Rinne, and Bing tests in subjects with normal and impaired hearing.
    • Varied techniques for test administration, including tuning fork placement and comparison methods.

    Main Results:

    • The Weber test demonstrated highest sensitivity and reliability when the tuning fork stem was placed on the upper incisors.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Rinne test transition points varied from 19 dB (loudness comparison) to 24 dB (threshold comparison).
  • The Bing test identified an air-bone gap of approximately 9 dB.

    • Conclusions:

    • Specific techniques enhance the diagnostic value of the Weber, Rinne, and Bing tests.
    • These refined methods can aid in more accurate hearing loss detection.