Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spatial localization under conflict conditions: is there a single explanation?

D H Warren

    Perception
    |January 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Finding locations in the environment: the map as mediator.

    Perception·1992
    Same author

    Research and practice: a delicate partnership.

    Journal of the American Optometric Association·1990
    Same author

    The importance of alignment in blind subjects' use of tactual maps.

    Perception·1989
    Same author

    Misaligned maps lead to predictable errors.

    Perception·1989
    Same author

    Behavioral observations of sensory substitution in neonate macaques (Macaca arctoides).

    Behavioral neuroscience·1987
    Same author

    Contributions of audition and vision to temporal rate perception.

    Perception & psychophysics·1986
    Same journal

    Predictive models and parameter analysis for multiple tactile perceptions in skin-wet fabrics interface.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    High-resolution kitsch by AI: Why society needs art, not more AI content.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    Benchmarking spatial discrimination thresholds of two-frame motion defined forms compared to luminance and stereoscopic defined forms.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    The effect of face masks on the perception of trustworthiness and competence in individuals with autistic traits.

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    The importance of external features for categorizing ethnicity: can Koreans identify Korean, Japanese, and Chinese faces?

    Perception·2026
    Same journal

    Interoception, alexithymia, and motor congruency: Psychological drivers of body ownership in virtual reality.

    Perception·2026
    See all related articles

    Investigating visual dominance in spatial localization, this study found that cognitive manipulation reduced visual influence on auditory cues but not proprioceptive ones. This suggests distinct processing for different sensory conflicts.

    Area of Science:

    • Neuroscience
    • Sensory Perception
    • Spatial Cognition

    Background:

    • Understanding spatial localization relies on integrating multisensory information.
    • Conflicting sensory inputs, particularly visual dominance, pose challenges in accurately perceiving spatial location.
    • The comparability of visual-auditory (VA) and visual-proprioceptive (VP) conflict situations requires further investigation.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To explore the comparability of visual-auditory (VA) and visual-proprioceptive (VP) localization conflict paradigms.
    • To investigate factors influencing visual dominance in multisensory spatial perception.
    • To determine if a unified explanation for localization conflict results is feasible.

    Main Methods:

    • Varied visual-auditory (VA) and visual-proprioceptive (VP) localization conflict paradigms across three experiments.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Manipulated visual dominance by altering visual field conditions and employing cognitive strategies to question visual reliability.
  • Assessed the impact of these manipulations on auditory and proprioceptive target localization.

    • Main Results:

    • Dimming the visual field or pairing auditory with proprioceptive information did not reduce visual dominance.
    • Cognitive manipulation reduced visual dominance over audition but not over proprioception.
    • Experiment 3 showed strong visual dominance for audition but no visual dominance for proprioception when targets were not perceived as related.

    Conclusions:

    • The visual-auditory and visual-proprioceptive conflict situations exhibit distinct characteristics, challenging a unitary explanation for localization conflict.
    • Sensory processing differences between auditory and proprioceptive systems likely contribute to varying degrees of visual dominance.
    • Further research is needed to explore additional factors before a comprehensive model of spatial localization conflict can be formulated.