Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Behavioural science in general practice.

D R Wood

    The Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners
    |October 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    This paper critiques Peter Sowerby's interpretation of Karl Popper and its impact on general practice. It argues Michael Balint's work significantly advanced whole-person medicine, countering Sowerby's critical conclusions.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Effect of porcine plasma on growth and health of Holstein calves.

    JDS communications·2022
    Same author

    Odderon Exchange from Elastic Scattering Differences between pp and pp[over ¯] Data at 1.96 TeV and from pp Forward Scattering Measurements.

    Physical review letters·2021
    Same author

    Short communication: Effects of different blood buffers administered in electrolyte solution to grain-fed veal calves experiencing diarrhea.

    Journal of dairy science·2020
    Same author

    Short communication: Effects of porcine plasma or combined sodium butyrate and Bacillus subtilis on growth and health of grain-fed veal calves.

    Journal of dairy science·2019
    Same author

    Measurement of the Effective Weak Mixing Angle in pp[over ¯]→Z/γ^{*}→ℓ^{+}ℓ^{-} Events.

    Physical review letters·2018
    Same author

    Combined Forward-Backward Asymmetry Measurements in Top-Antitop Quark Production at the Tevatron.

    Physical review letters·2018
    See all related articles

    Area of Science:

    • Medical philosophy
    • General practice
    • Psychodynamic medicine

    Background:

    • Peter Sowerby presented a critique of Michael Balint's contributions to general practice.
    • Sowerby's critique is based on his interpretation of Karl Popper's philosophy of science.
    • The critique suggests Balint's work may hinder the progress of general practice.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To dispute Sowerby's interpretation of Karl Popper's writings.
    • To challenge Sowerby's conclusions regarding Michael Balint's influence on general practice.
    • To reaffirm the value of Balint's work in promoting whole-person medicine.

    Main Methods:

    • Philosophical analysis of Sowerby's and Balint's work.
    • Interpretation of Karl Popper's scientific philosophy.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Argumentative critique of Sowerby's conclusions.

    • Main Results:

    • Disagreement with Sowerby's interpretation of Popper.
    • Rejection of Sowerby's conclusions about Balint's work.
    • Assertion that Balint's contributions are vital for whole-person medicine.

    Conclusions:

    • Sowerby's critique, based on a disputed Popperian interpretation, is flawed.
    • Michael Balint's work represents a significant advancement for general practice.
    • Balint's approach is essential for the continued development of whole-person care in medicine.