Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Relative ear protector performance in high vs low sound levels.

T D Thunder, J E Lankford

    American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
    |December 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary

    Hearing impaired individuals received less ear protection attenuation than normal hearing individuals. Standardized testing may overestimate earplug effectiveness in noisy environments.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Ambient noise levels in nursing homes: implications for audiometric assessment.

    American journal of audiology·2000
    Same author

    Ambient noise levels in mobile audiometric testing facilities: compliance with industry standards.

    AAOHN journal : official journal of the American Association of Occupational Health Nurses·1999
    Same author

    Otolithic evoked potentials: a new technique for vestibular studies.

    Acta oto-laryngologica·1986
    Same author

    Noise reduction characteristics of prefabricated sound-isolating enclosures: a laboratory, field measurement, and theoretical analysis.

    Ear and hearing·1984
    Same author

    A comparative study of alternative bone-conduction calibration methods.

    Ear and hearing·1981
    Same author

    The manual LOT test.

    Journal of the American Audiology Society·1977

    Area of Science:

    • Audiology
    • Occupational Health
    • Hearing Conservation

    Background:

    • Ear protectors are crucial for preventing noise-induced hearing loss.
    • Standardized testing (ANSI S3.19-1974) is used to assess earplug attenuation.
    • Real-world noise exposure varies significantly from laboratory conditions.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To compare the attenuation of a specific ear protector between normal hearing and hearing-impaired subjects.
    • To evaluate the accuracy of standard earplug testing methods in realistic noisy environments.

    Main Methods:

    • Attenuation measurements were taken using one type of ear protector.
    • Two groups of five subjects each participated: one with normal hearing and one with hearing impairment.
    • Sound intensity levels were adjusted based on subject group (high for impaired, low for normal).

    Main Results:

    • The hearing-impaired group demonstrated significantly lower earplug attenuation compared to the normal hearing group.
    • The difference in attenuation suggests a potential limitation in standardized testing procedures.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardized earplug testing procedures, like ANSI S3.19-1974, may overestimate real-world protection, especially for hearing-impaired individuals in noisy settings.
    • Current methods might not accurately reflect earplug performance across diverse hearing statuses and noise levels.

    Related Experiment Videos