Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Free flap transfers for upper extremity reconstruction.

R K Daniel, B Faibisoff

    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore
    |October 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Endoscopic forehead lift.

    Aesthetic surgery journal·2009
    Same author

    Endoscopic forehead lift: anatomic basis.

    Aesthetic surgery journal·2009
    Same author

    Rhinoplasty: large nostril/small tip disproportion.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2001
    Same author

    Rhinoplasty: a simplified, three-stitch, open tip suture technique. Part I: primary rhinoplasty.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999
    Same author

    Rhinoplasty: a simplified, three-stitch, open tip suture technique. Part II: secondary rhinoplasty.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1999
    Same author

    Endoscopic forehead lift: an operative technique.

    Plastic and reconstructive surgery·1996
    Same journal

    "Gazing into the crystal ball of mortality prediction in conservative kidney care": Correspondence.

    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore·2026
    Same journal

    Vascular stiffness and sepsis mortality: A promising signal in search of clinical relevance.

    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore·2026
    Same journal

    Transcatheter aortic valve implantation for severe aortic regurgitation with Trilogy system: Initial Southeast Asia experience.

    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore·2026
    Same journal

    Singapore expert consensus on optimising lipid-lowering strategies in acute coronary syndrome: A modified Delphi study.

    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore·2026
    Same journal

    Association of estimated pulse wave velocity with 28-day mortality in sepsis: A MIMIC-IV study.

    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore·2026
    Same journal

    Prognostic value of the monocyte-to-albumin ratio in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective cohort study.

    Annals of the Academy of Medicine, Singapore·2026
    See all related articles

    This study compares three donor sites for free flap transfer to the upper extremity. Iliofemoral, dorsalis pedis, and latissimus dorsi flaps each have unique benefits and drawbacks for reconstructive surgery.

    Area of Science:

    • Orthopedic Surgery
    • Plastic Surgery
    • Reconstructive Surgery

    Background:

    • Free flap transfer is a critical reconstructive technique for upper extremity injuries.
    • Selecting an optimal donor site is crucial for successful outcomes in free flap surgery.

    Observation:

    • This study examines clinical cases utilizing three distinct donor sites for free flap transfer to the upper extremity.
    • The donor sites analyzed include the iliofemoral region, dorsalis pedis, and latissimus dorsi.
    • Each site's suitability for upper extremity reconstruction is evaluated based on surgical case presentations.

    Findings:

    • The iliofemoral donor site offers robust tissue volume but may involve longer operative times and potential donor site morbidity.
    • The dorsalis pedis flap provides a reliable vascular supply and is suitable for smaller defects, though tissue volume can be limited.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • The latissimus dorsi flap is versatile, offering significant tissue bulk and a long vascular pedicle, but may present aesthetic concerns and functional limitations.

    • Implications:

    • Understanding the specific advantages and disadvantages of each donor site (iliofemoral, dorsalis pedis, latissimus dorsi) aids surgeons in tailoring free flap selection to individual patient needs.
    • This comparative analysis informs surgical decision-making for complex upper extremity reconstructions, potentially improving functional and aesthetic results.
    • Further research could explore patient-reported outcomes and long-term functional recovery associated with each donor site in upper extremity free flap transfers.