Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Reaction and response times for accommodation.

J Tucker, W N Charman

    American Journal of Optometry and Physiological Optics
    |August 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Measurement of single-diffractive dijet production in proton-proton collisions at <math> </math> with the CMS and TOTEM experiments.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020
    Same author

    Studies of Charm Quark Diffusion inside Jets Using Pb-Pb and pp Collisions at sqrt[s_{NN}]=5.02  TeV.

    Physical review letters·2020
    Same author

    Elevated CO<sub>2</sub> protects poplar (Populus trichocarpa × P. deltoides) from damage induced by O<sub>3</sub>: identification of mechanisms.

    Functional plant biology : FPB·2020
    Same author

    Hydrogeological typologies of the Indo-Gangetic basin alluvial aquifer, South Asia.

    Hydrogeology journal·2020
    Same author

    Measurement of electroweak production of a <math></math> boson in association with two jets in proton-proton collisions at <math> </math>.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020
    Same author

    Search for heavy resonances that decay into a vector boson and a Higgs boson in hadronic final states at <math> </math> <math></math>.

    The European physical journal. C, Particles and fields·2020
    Same journal

    Visual decrement with deposit accumulation of HEMA contact lenses.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Stiles-Burch two-degree color mixture data.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Undercorrection and myopia development.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    The International Optometric and Optical League.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    Quantitative photorefraction using an off-center flash source.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    Same journal

    An objective VER assessment of visual acuity compared with subjective measures.

    American journal of optometry and physiological optics·1988
    See all related articles

    Individual differences in visual accommodation were observed between two participants. One participant

    Area of Science:

    • Ophthalmology and Vision Science
    • Human Physiology
    • Psychophysics

    Background:

    • Accurate visual accommodation is crucial for clear vision.
    • Individual variability in accommodative responses can impact visual performance.
    • Understanding these differences is important for visual ergonomics and training.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To qualitatively compare the accommodation responses of two observers to step changes in target position.
    • To investigate intersubject differences in accommodative ability and response characteristics.
    • To explore factors influencing these variations, including instructions given.

    Main Methods:

    • Utilized an infra-red dynamic optometer for precise measurement.
    • Assessed accommodation responses to step changes in target position.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Measured reaction time (latency) and response time of accommodation.

    • Main Results:

    • Marked differences were found in the ability of two observers to accommodate correctly.
    • Reaction times were comparable to existing literature and independent of target position.
    • Response time varied with the required accommodative change for one observer, but not the other.

    Conclusions:

    • Significant intersubject variability exists in human accommodative responses.
    • Factors such as individual ability and potentially the influence of instructions contribute to these differences.
    • Further research is needed to fully elucidate the mechanisms behind these variations.