Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Geometrical considerations for Compton scatter densitometry.

A L Huddleston, D Bhaduri, J Weaver

    Medical Physics
    |November 1, 1979
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Simulation modelling as a tool to guide control strategies for foot and mouth disease in an endemic country: Nusa Tenggara Barat, Indonesia 2023-2024.

    Preventive veterinary medicine·2026
    Same author

    Shear-enhanced dynamic permeability development of magma vesiculating in cylindrical conduits.

    Scientific reports·2026
    Same author

    Low-energy cross-section measurement of the <sup>10</sup>B(<i>α</i>, <i>n</i>)<sup>13</sup>N reaction and its impact on neutron production in first-generation stars.

    The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces·2025
    Same author

    Achievement of Target Gain Larger than Unity in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

    Physical review letters·2024
    Same author

    Immune checkpoint inhibitor-related myasthenia gravis, myositis and myocarditis: a triad but not at the same time?

    QJM : monthly journal of the Association of Physicians·2024
    Same author

    Lawson Criterion for Ignition Exceeded in an Inertial Fusion Experiment.

    Physical review letters·2022
    Same journal

    Correction to "On the shape of the radiation survival curve in tumor spheroids: The role of oxygen heterogeneity".

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Multi-view constrained semi-supervised vertebra detection for 3D ultrasound spine volume.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Accuracy of quantitative <sup>177</sup>Lu SPECT/CT imaging: A systematic review.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Physics-constrained dual-domain network for CBCT reconstruction from orthogonal X-rays in gynecologic radiotherapy.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Decomposition-based harmonization for quantitative PET imaging across scanners and radiotracers.

    Medical physics·2026
    Same journal

    Development and evaluation of an in vivo dose-based monitoring system for electron FLASH radiation therapy.

    Medical physics·2026
    See all related articles

    Compton scatter densitometry accuracy depends on measurement geometry. Adjustments are crucial for accurate physical density in large or dense samples like bone tissue.

    Area of Science:

    • Medical Physics
    • Biomedical Engineering
    • Materials Science

    Background:

    • Compton scatter densitometry is a non-invasive technique for measuring physical density.
    • Accurate density determination is vital in fields like bone research and materials science.
    • The technique's accuracy can be affected by various geometrical factors.

    Purpose of the Study:

    • To experimentally analyze the influence of geometrical parameters on Compton scatter densitometry.
    • To evaluate the impact of sample diameter, density range, and scattering volume on relative electron density.
    • To define and quantify the bias in computed Compton density due to scattering and attenuation.

    Main Methods:

    • Experimental analysis of samples with known densities.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • Systematic variation of geometrical parameters: sample diameter, scattering volume size and shape.
  • Measurement of relative electron density values using Compton scatter densitometry.

    • Main Results:

    • Geometrical factors significantly influence relative electron density measurements.
    • Multiple scattering and attenuation introduce a bias in computed Compton density.
    • A mathematical expression relating density bias to geometrical parameters was derived.

    Conclusions:

    • Compton scatter densitometry requires careful consideration of geometrical parameters for accurate results.
    • Corrections are essential for physical density determination in large-diameter or high-density samples, such as cortical and cancellous bone.
    • Understanding these geometrical dependencies improves the reliability of densitometry in biomedical and material applications.