Related Experiment Videos
Letter: S.L.E. and Klinefelter's syndrome
Lancet (London, England)
|January 10, 1976
Summary
No abstract available in PubMed .
Related Concept Videos
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Ivor Lewis vs Mckeown esophagectomy: analysis of operative outcomes from the ACS NSQIP database.
General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery·2020
Intergenerational transmission of adverse childhood experiences via maternal depression and anxiety and moderation by child sex.
Journal of developmental origins of health and disease·2018
Association of the ROBO1 gene with reading disabilities in a family-based analysis.
Genes, brain, and behavior·2014
A family-based association analysis and meta-analysis of the reading disabilities candidate gene DYX1C1.
American journal of medical genetics. Part B, Neuropsychiatric genetics : the official publication of the International Society of Psychiatric Genetics·2013
Dense-map genome scan for dyslexia supports loci at 4q13, 16p12, 17q22; suggests novel locus at 7q36.
Genes, brain, and behavior·2012
The term comorbidity is of questionable value in reference to developmental disorders: data and theory.
Journal of learning disabilities·2004
Speech-language pathologists' perceptions of common myths related to deaf and hard of hearing children who use signed language.
Journal of deaf studies and deaf education·2026
[Effects of bone conduction device on speech recognition in noise and listening effort in patients with single-sided deafness].
Lin chuang er bi yan hou tou jing wai ke za zhi = Journal of clinical otorhinolaryngology head and neck surgery·2026
Both fast and slow speech can increase listening effort and impair speech comprehension in young listeners.
The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026
Addressing Diagnostic Challenges in Acquired Apraxia of Speech: A Preliminary Study to Inform Curriculum Development.
American journal of speech-language pathology·2026
Speech intelligibility depends on listener experience: Comparing speech-language pathologists, naïve listeners, and automated recognition.
Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2026